2015年11月13日金曜日 23時27分46秒 UTC+9 Kathleen Wilson:
> On 11/13/15 5:43 AM, Peter Kurrasch wrote:
> > Kathleen, is SECOM getting special treatment? I was wondering if there was
> > some reason to move forward before a CA has everything in order? Will we be
> > seeing more of this going forward?
> >
>
Dear Ryan-san and public discussion members,
The updated SECOM CP for Ryan-san's comment is attached to
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1096205
CP (English): https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=8679302
The addition for the section 2.2, 3.2.7 and 4.9.9 addressed with
Dear Ryan-san and public discussion members,
The updated SECOM CP for Ryan-san's comment is attached to
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1096205
CP (English): https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=8679302
The addition for the section 2.2, 3.2.7 and 4.9.9 addressed with
2015年8月26日水曜日 4時29分37秒 UTC+9 Ryan Sleevi:
> On Wed, August 5, 2015 2:51 pm, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
> > SECOM has applied to enable EV treatment for the "Security Communication
> > RootCA2" root certificate that was included in NSS via Bugzilla Bug
> > #527419.
> >
> > SECOM is a Japanese
2015年8月26日水曜日 4時29分37秒 UTC+9 Ryan Sleevi:
> On Wed, August 5, 2015 2:51 pm, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
> > SECOM has applied to enable EV treatment for the "Security Communication
> > RootCA2" root certificate that was included in NSS via Bugzilla Bug
> > #527419.
> >
> > SECOM is a Japanese
5 matches
Mail list logo