Re: c=US policy layer in development

2018-04-10 Thread okaphone.elektronika--- via dev-security-policy
On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 01:06:36 UTC+2, Peter Bachman wrote: > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/cus-policy-layer Can you give us a few words, with the links you drop here? It would be nice. Especially when in order to see what the link is about you must first become a member of the

Re: c=US policy layer in development

2018-04-10 Thread westmail24--- via dev-security-policy
I do not understand this secrecy for reading anyway. Andrew ___ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Re: c=US policy layer in development

2018-04-10 Thread Peter Bowen via dev-security-policy
As far as I know, this has nothing to do with Mozilla policy. On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:28 PM westmail24--- via dev-security-policy < dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org> wrote: > If Mozilla develops an open product, then why are some discussions > unavailable to users even for reading? (I'm

c=US policy layer in development

2018-04-09 Thread westmail24--- via dev-security-policy
If Mozilla develops an open product, then why are some discussions unavailable to users even for reading? (I'm not sure that this will protect against the PRISM intelligence system inside Google groups, so you have secrets from random users?) ___

c=US policy layer in development

2018-04-09 Thread Peter Bachman via dev-security-policy
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/cus-policy-layer ___ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy