Re: CA scope transparency (was Re: Name-constraining government CAs, or not)

2015-06-09 Thread Rob Stradling
On 09/06/15 04:05, Clint Wilson wrote: To further support your claims here, Chris, there are already tools coming out which actively monitor domains in CT logs and can be set up with notifications of misissuance: https://www.digicert.com/certificate-monitoring/

Re: CA scope transparency (was Re: Name-constraining government CAs, or not)

2015-06-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On 2015-06-09 15:26, Peter Kurrasch wrote: 3) How frequently might such tools run? Or to put it differently, how much time do I probably have between when I issue a gmail cert and when someone figures it out (and of course how much longer before my illegitimate cert is no longer valid)? I

Re: CA scope transparency (was Re: Name-constraining government CAs, or not)

2015-06-09 Thread Rick Andrews
On Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 3:05:30 AM UTC-7, Hubert Kario wrote: True, OTOH, if a third party says that there was a misissuance, that means there was one. I disagree. Only the domain owner knows for sure what is a misissuance, and what isn't. It seems likely that I might turn over all known

Re: CA scope transparency (was Re: Name-constraining government CAs, or not)

2015-06-09 Thread Rick Andrews
On Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 7:45:05 AM UTC-7, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On 2015-06-09 15:26, Peter Kurrasch wrote: 3) How frequently might such tools run? Or to put it differently, how much time do I probably have between when I issue a gmail cert and when someone figures it out (and of course

Re: CA scope transparency (was Re: Name-constraining government CAs, or not)

2015-06-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:00:23PM -0700, Rick Andrews wrote: On Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 7:45:05 AM UTC-7, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On 2015-06-09 15:26, Peter Kurrasch wrote: 3) How frequently might such tools run? Or to put it differently, how much time do I probably have between when I

Re: CA scope transparency (was Re: Name-constraining government CAs, or not)

2015-06-09 Thread Rick Andrews
On Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 12:23:57 PM UTC-7, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:00:23PM -0700, Rick Andrews wrote: On Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 7:45:05 AM UTC-7, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On 2015-06-09 15:26, Peter Kurrasch wrote: 3) How frequently might such tools run? Or to put it