As a side note to the main topic, I find it curious and a little disconcerting
that the referred link to the E assessement of CrossCert, (outlined in Point
2 of "Additional Follow-ups") found on the document linked by Steve (here :
https://bug1334377.bmoattachments.org/attachment.cgi?id=8831038
On 04/02/17 14:32, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> Gerv, as the information Steve shared about their other RAs show, their
> issues with RAs are not limited to CrossCert, unfortunately. Check out the
> rest of the details included.
Ouch. Thank you for drawing these to my attention; I had neglected to
read
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 3:10 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
>
> 4) Is there any reliable programmatic way of determining, looking only
> at the contents of the certificate or certificate chain, that a
> certificate was issued by CrossCert personnel using their processes, as
> opposed
On 31/01/17 04:51, Steve Medin wrote:
> Our response to questions up to January 27, 2017 has been posted as an
> attachment to bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1334377.
Quoting that document:
"Q: 4) In response to the previous incident, Symantec indicated it
updated its internal
4 matches
Mail list logo