Ryan Sleevi wrote:
>
>
>> It would be easier to understand if this is true if the proposed text
>> cited the RFCs, like RFC 4055, that actually impose the requirements that
>> result in the given encodings.
>>
>
> Could you clarify, do you just mean adding references to each of the
> example
> Note that this is applicable for signatureAlgorithms as well (and the same
> section of the RFC), and this is again something cablint picks up and zlint
> misses. However, it seems CAs happened to already have revoked these
> certificates - perhaps from internal linting efforts that looked at
GlobalSign has revoked the respective certificates and is investigating root
cause. Thanks.
> -Original Message-
> From: dev-security-policy
On
> Behalf Of Ryan Sleevi via dev-security-policy
> Sent: dinsdag 21 mei 2019 6:06
> To: Brian Smith
> Cc: Ryan Sleevi ;
3 matches
Mail list logo