Re: Name-constraining government CAs, or not

2015-05-15 Thread Gervase Markham
On 15/05/15 00:01, Ryan Sleevi wrote: On Thu, May 14, 2015 9:02 am, David E. Ross wrote: With cyberwarfare constantly discussed in the news, U.S. Congress, and other venues, it appears to me that government CAs should indeed be restricted to the TLDs of their respective jurisdictions.

Re: Name-constraining government CAs, or not

2015-05-15 Thread Gervase Markham
On 14/05/15 17:02, David E. Ross wrote: There is an ongoing dispute between the U.S. and China whether the government in China is behind attacks on both government and commercial computer systems in the U.S. This is NOT to question the trustworthiness of the government of China but to give

Re: Name-constraining government CAs, or not

2015-05-15 Thread Matt Palmer
Everything that Ryan says below, is what I would have said if I were as eloquent. - Matt On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:49:39AM -0700, Ryan Sleevi wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2015 1:52 am, Gervase Markham wrote: On 15/05/15 00:01, Ryan Sleevi wrote: I think there's also the broader consideration

Re: Name-constraining government CAs, or not

2015-05-15 Thread Ryan Sleevi
On Fri, May 15, 2015 1:52 am, Gervase Markham wrote: On 15/05/15 00:01, Ryan Sleevi wrote: I think there's also the broader consideration of whether Mozilla's policy interests are served by promoting borders on the Internet, which David's proposal certainly does, but the broader question