On 26/10/15 23:46, Richard Barnes wrote:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1204656
I'm surprised it's taken LE as long as a month to review whether the
info-gathering document has been correctly transcribed...
Gerv
___
dev-security-policy
The CA/Browser Forum should create a public log of instances where a CA has
notified the CA/Browser Forum of conflicts between the Guidelines and local law.
-Original Message-
From: dev-security-policy
[mailto:dev-security-policy-bounces+ben=digicert@lists.mozilla.org] On
Behalf Of
On 9/21/15 4:02 PM, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
The next item on our list to discuss is:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:CertificatePolicyV2.3
(D2) CA/Browser Forum Baseline Requirements version 1.1.6 added a
requirement regarding technically constraining subordinate CA
certificates, so item #9 of the
On Wed, October 28, 2015 1:55 am, mycho...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Dear Sleevi
>
> First of all, I appreciate your detailed opinios and suggestions
>
> In terms of option B (application to only be for that of your SSL/website
> CA rather than your root CA)
> All CAs in CA hierarchy (including
On 10/28/15 2:14 PM, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
Google has blogged about this:
https://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.com/2015/10/sustaining-digital-certificate-security.html
All,
We should discuss what actions Mozilla should require of Symantec, and
what would be the penalty of not completing
On 10/19/15 4:34 PM, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
Therefore, I also propose that we don't separate out the audit criteria
according to trust bit in version 2.3 of the policy. Rather, the
separation will be part of another effort to create a separate S/MIME
policy in 2016.
This means that the
Google has blogged about this:
https://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.com/2015/10/sustaining-digital-certificate-security.html
___
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
Bonsoir,
Le mercredi 28 octobre 2015 14:53:39 UTC+1, raf...@gmail.com a écrit :
> > However, https://crt.sh/?id=8983568 shows a TLS server certificate valid
> > for 4 years and delivered in 2015.
> As already it has been commented, this subCA was developed for a private and
> restricted
8 matches
Mail list logo