On 15/10/2018 20:01, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
I have added the following section to the Required Practices wiki page:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/Required_or_Recommended_Practices#BR_Commitment_to_Comply_statement_in_CP.2FCPS
I will continue to appreciate feedback on this update.
Thanks,
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 03:44:44PM -0700, Kathleen Wilson via
dev-security-policy wrote:
> I think that a blank section means the same thing as "No stipulation".
> Should we require that sections not be left blank?
I think that for the avoidance of any sort of doubt or confusion, it would
be
On 10/18/18 2:03 PM, Joanna Fox wrote:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/Required_or_Recommended_Practices#CP.2FCPS_Structured_According_to_RFC_3647
For clarification on this statement, "Any CPS that falls within the scope of
Mozilla’s program must not use the words “No stipulation” unless the
On Wednesday, October 17, 2018 at 9:08:41 PM UTC-4, Matt Palmer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 03:09:52PM -0700, identrust--- via
> dev-security-policy wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 16, 2018 at 7:19:07 PM UTC-4, Matt Palmer wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 02:18:39PM -0700, identrust---
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 19:01, Rob Stradling wrote:
> On 12/10/18 16:40, Ryan Sleevi via dev-security-policy wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 8:33 AM Ben Laurie wrote:
>
> >> This is one of the reasons we also need revocation transparency.
> >
> > As tempting as the buzzword is, and as much
On Monday, October 15, 2018 at 11:23:05 AM UTC-7, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
> On 10/15/18 11:01 AM, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
> > I have added the following section to the Required Practices wiki page:
> >
> >
6 matches
Mail list logo
