I don't think we've commented on this before, but I'll note that sending an
e-mail
from the e-mail address listed as the contact address on a website is not
one of
the approved methods of showing ownership or control of a website as
specified
in section 3.2.2.4. The approved methods of validating
A lot of things changes in 3 months it seems. ??
The wording for the new "validation of domain authorization or control [...]
should not be relied upon" condition seems open to interpretation, so I'm not
sure if it really applies here. Wouldn't it fully cover the "no longer legally
permitted"
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 11:49 PM please please
wrote:
> I just noticed that Comodo CA has finally posted its incident report in
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1492006
>
> Comments:
> - The report suggests that no BR violation occurred because I was not the
> Subscriber to fulfill
I just noticed that Comodo CA has finally posted its incident report in
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1492006
Comments:
- The report suggests that no BR violation occurred because I was not the
Subscriber to fulfill the conditions in bullet point 1 of BR 4.9.1.1. However,
I
4 matches
Mail list logo
