Hi Ryan,
>My request was one of just taking a few days / a week to re-examine what
>the current BRs are, using your knowledge of your policies and practices,
>and make sure that all methods are consistent. For example, the 64-bits of
>entropy, the aligned-with-3.2.2.4.6 method of domain valida
Hi Ryan,
>Right, but the reason I highlighted this is that the audit noted
>conformance to v1.4.1, but the process you described wasn't consistent with
>v1.4.1. It's understandable that the auditable controls for 1.4.1 have not
>been developed, so I'm not particularly surprised that this would
Hi Kathleen,
Our updated CP/CPS documents in Turkish and in English are now in our web page.
Here are the related links:
http://depo.kamusm.gov.tr/ilke/KamuSM_CPS/KamuSM_CPS_En.pdf
http://depo.kamusm.gov.tr/ilke/KamuSM_CPS/KamuSM_CPS_Tr.pdf
___
de
Hi Ryan,
Firstly, thank you for spending time and reviewing our work. Our answer to the
two points you have stated is the following.
1) Domain Validation Methods
> This section states "WHOIS records pertinent to domain name specified in
> the certificate application shall be verified via 'ww
4 matches
Mail list logo