On 06/11/2017 17:05, m.wiedenho...@tuvit.de wrote:
TÜViT as a conformity assessment body would like to add some explanations to
clear up some misunderstandings about ETSI auditing.
First of all, we would like to give one preliminary remark. ETSI has separated
the TSP technical requirements
Thank you for clarification.
Do you think the terms "/approval scheme/", "/supervision scheme/",
"/accreditation//scheme/" etc. (used in some ETSI TSs or the Commission
Decisions) have the same meaning and ETSI EN 319 403 is just one of
possible "/certification scheme/s"?
Thanks,
M.D.
On
TÜViT as a conformity assessment body would like to add some explanations to
clear up some misunderstandings about ETSI auditing.
First of all, we would like to give one preliminary remark. ETSI has separated
the TSP technical requirements (ETSI EN 319 411-1, ETSI EN 319 401) from the
CAB
Am Montag, 30. Oktober 2017 22:19:31 UTC+1 schrieb Ryan Sleevi:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Kathleen Wilson via dev-security-policy <
> dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
> >
> > How do we get all auditors to start meeting our audit statement
> > requirements?
> >
> > Why haven't
Hi Arno,
On 31/10/17 08:46, Arno Fiedler wrote:
> there is a problem with the auditor qualification and the national
> accreditation of some auditing bodies.
Can you help us understand what about the discussion so far leads you to
that conclusion? It seems to me that the problem being raised is
Hello Kathleen,
there is a problem with the auditor qualification and the national
accreditation of some auditing bodies.
We´ll ask ACABc to suggest a solution to take care about proper education of
"qualified" auditors and "good practise" audit statements as suggested by
Mozilla, maybe we
On Monday, October 30, 2017 at 5:02:08 PM UTC-7, Buschart, Rufus wrote:
> Our ETSI audit report
> (https://www.siemens.com/corp/pool/pki/siemens_etsi.pdf) states:
>
> > An audit of the certification service, documented in a report, provided
> > evidence that the requirements of the following
>
o: mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: Re: ETSI audits not listing audit periods
On Monday, October 30, 2017 at 2:59:31 PM UTC-7, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
>
> I would expect that it would be incumbent on the CABs and the CAs
> providing EN 319 411-1 certificates to help the comm
On Monday, October 30, 2017 at 2:59:31 PM UTC-7, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
>
> I would expect that it would be incumbent on the CABs and the CAs providing
> EN 319 411-1 certificates to help the community better understand the level
> of assurance provided. That is, I think those supporting the
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Kathleen Wilson via dev-security-policy <
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
>
> How do we get all auditors to start meeting our audit statement
> requirements?
>
> Why haven't all included CAs communicated these requirements to their
> auditors?
>
> Why
10 matches
Mail list logo