On 02/08/2017 04:28, Han Yuwei wrote:
在 2017年8月1日星期二 UTC+8下午8:47:57,Nick Lamb写道:
On Tuesday, 1 August 2017 08:39:28 UTC+1, Han Yuwei wrote:
1. the CN of two cerificates are same. So it is not necessary to issue two
certificates in just 2 minutes.
I think the most likely explanation is the d
在 2017年8月1日星期二 UTC+8下午8:47:57,Nick Lamb写道:
> On Tuesday, 1 August 2017 08:39:28 UTC+1, Han Yuwei wrote:
> > 1. the CN of two cerificates are same. So it is not necessary to issue two
> > certificates in just 2 minutes.
>
> I think the most likely explanation is the difference in signature algori
On Tuesday, 1 August 2017 08:39:28 UTC+1, Han Yuwei wrote:
> 1. the CN of two cerificates are same. So it is not necessary to issue two
> certificates in just 2 minutes.
I think the most likely explanation is the difference in signature algorithm,
but it is also not uncommon for subscribers to
https://crt.sh/?id=7040227
https://crt.sh/?id=30328289
I am confused for those reasons.
1. the CN of two cerificates are same. So it is not necessary to issue two
certificates in just 2 minutes.
2. second one used SHA1, though is consistent with BR, but first one used
SHA256.
3. first one has 3
4 matches
Mail list logo