On Fri, March 20, 2015 8:10 am, Certificates wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for your detailed second review.
>
> Please, find our answers below.
Kathleen pointed out my original message was unclear, but I think it's
fine to progress on this inclusion.
While nothing prohibits OCSP nonces, I do h
Hello,
Thank you for your detailed second review.
Please, find our answers below.
--- PEDANTRY
Section 2.4 of the CP still states "TLS" as "TSL protocol"
Section 1.1 of the CPS alternates between identifying the CPS as "CPS" and
"CSP"
Section 1.3 perhaps mistranslates "Relying Party" as "Tr
Question 1:From reading the CP and CPS, I fail to see the distinction
between type 3(VPN) and type 4 (SSL) certificates (numbers from 1.4.1 of
the CPS), withrespect to extendedKeyUsage and subjectAltName. That is, a
VPN certificateMAY be usable as an SSL certificate by a subscriber,
without any
3 matches
Mail list logo