On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Patrick Kobly wrote:
> Perhaps I'm dense and missing something or perhaps this isn't the right
> place to be asking. Why would this necessitate bringing the CA online when
> responses can be signed by an Authorized Responder (i.e. cert with EKU
> id-kp-OCSPSigni
: mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: Re: CA Communication - May 12, 2014
On Monday, 12 May 2014 13:45:16 UTC-6, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
> +1. This is especially true in the federal space where some
intermediates
>
> are stored offline most of the time. Per Section 4.9.7 of
On Monday, 12 May 2014 13:45:16 UTC-6, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
> +1. This is especially true in the federal space where some intermediates
>
> are stored offline most of the time. Per Section 4.9.7 of the FBCA CP,
>
> these CAs use a 31-day interval for status information. Bringing the CA
>
>
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=991815#c24
...sounded like a reasonable plan to me.
Yet AFAICT somewhere between comment 24 and comment 28 you've elected to
bypass the CABForum process.
The BRs permit OCSP Responses for Intermediate CA Certificates to be valid
for <=12 months. Sud
Communication - May 12, 2014
On 12/05/14 18:40, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
> All,
>
> The final draft of the CA Communication is here:
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:Communications#May_12.2C_2014
>
> If you have further comments or feedback on this, please send your
> input now
On 12/05/14 18:40, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
All,
The final draft of the CA Communication is here:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:Communications#May_12.2C_2014
If you have further comments or feedback on this, please send your input
now.
Otherwise, I will send the communication (via email) this after
On 5/12/14, 11:07 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:40:27AM -0700, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
All,
The final draft of the CA Communication is here:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:Communications#May_12.2C_2014
So I've asked about this before but I think you never replied. It
doesn't
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:40:27AM -0700, Kathleen Wilson wrote:
> All,
>
> The final draft of the CA Communication is here:
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:Communications#May_12.2C_2014
So I've asked about this before but I think you never replied. It
doesn't mention anything about the EV audit.
8 matches
Mail list logo