On 13/03/2019 03:04, Peter Gutmann wrote:
> Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy
> writes:
>
>> I've been working on an alternative proposal for a serial number generation
>> scheme, for which I intend to write an I-D and propose to the LAMPS WG.
>
> This seems really, really complicated.
Yes
On 13/03/2019 03:18, Matthew Hardeman wrote:
> Overall I think it's a neat scheme.
>
> It does impose some trade-offs beyond the mechanism that I proposed:
>
> 1. It leaves the implementing CA with no space within the serial number
> field to include a CA significant sequence number, timestamp,
Overall I think it's a neat scheme.
It does impose some trade-offs beyond the mechanism that I proposed:
1. It leaves the implementing CA with no space within the serial number
field to include a CA significant sequence number, timestamp, or other
value. That may not be a bad thing, but it's ot
Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy
writes:
>I've been working on an alternative proposal for a serial number generation
>scheme, for which I intend to write an I-D and propose to the LAMPS WG.
This seems really, really complicated. In all of the endless debate over
this, the one thing that
Hi all. I've been working on an alternative proposal for a serial
number generation scheme, for which I intend to write an I-D and propose
to the LAMPS WG. However, since other folks' proposals are already
flowing, I will share the gist of mine here. Comments welcome!
- Serial Number Ori
5 matches
Mail list logo
