Re: Hunting for intermediates that still haven't been disclosed to CCADB

2017-05-19 Thread Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy
On 17/05/17 15:12, Gervase Markham wrote: On 17/05/17 15:08, Rob Stradling wrote: Incidentally, it's true that Mozilla have said that they don't care about the Code Signing trust bit any more, but the CKA_TRUST_CODE_SIGNING haven't yet been removed from certdata.txt. Bug? Yes, but a low

Re: Hunting for intermediates that still haven't been disclosed to CCADB

2017-05-17 Thread Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy
On 17/05/17 15:21, Gervase Markham via dev-security-policy wrote: On 17/05/17 15:15, Rob Stradling wrote: Shall I add the same two fields to https://crt.sh/mozilla-disclosures#disclosureincomplete as well? Yes, why not? :-) Gerv Done. The "Listed Here Since" timestamps for the 24

Re: Hunting for intermediates that still haven't been disclosed to CCADB

2017-05-17 Thread Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy
On 17/05/17 15:12, Gervase Markham via dev-security-policy wrote: On 17/05/17 13:32, Rob Stradling wrote: I've just added two columns to https://crt.sh/mozilla-disclosures#undisclosed: - "Earliest SCT". - "Listed Here Since". Lovely! Now we just need a cert to be on the list so we can

Re: Hunting for intermediates that still haven't been disclosed to CCADB

2017-05-17 Thread Gervase Markham via dev-security-policy
On 17/05/17 13:32, Rob Stradling wrote: > I've just added two columns to > https://crt.sh/mozilla-disclosures#undisclosed: > - "Earliest SCT". > - "Listed Here Since". Lovely! Now we just need a cert to be on the list so we can see what it looks like ;-) Gerv

Re: Hunting for intermediates that still haven't been disclosed to CCADB

2017-05-17 Thread Gervase Markham via dev-security-policy
On 17/05/17 15:08, Rob Stradling wrote: > Incidentally, it's true that Mozilla have said that they don't care > about the Code Signing trust bit any more, but the > CKA_TRUST_CODE_SIGNING haven't yet been removed from certdata.txt. Bug? Yes, but a low priority one. Feel free to file :-) Gerv

Re: Hunting for intermediates that still haven't been disclosed to CCADB

2017-05-17 Thread Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy
On 17/05/17 14:43, Kurt Roeckx via dev-security-policy wrote: On 2017-05-17 14:40, Rob Stradling wrote: On 12/05/17 16:37, Kurt Roeckx via dev-security-policy wrote: On 2017-05-11 19:05, Gervase Markham wrote: On 11/05/17 12:46, Rob Stradling wrote: There's a "Created by" field (Username,

Re: Hunting for intermediates that still haven't been disclosed to CCADB

2017-05-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx via dev-security-policy
On 2017-05-17 14:40, Rob Stradling wrote: On 12/05/17 16:37, Kurt Roeckx via dev-security-policy wrote: On 2017-05-11 19:05, Gervase Markham wrote: On 11/05/17 12:46, Rob Stradling wrote: There's a "Created by" field (Username, Timestamp) and a "Last Modified By" field (Username, Timestamp)

Re: Hunting for intermediates that still haven't been disclosed to CCADB

2017-05-17 Thread Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy
On 11/05/17 18:05, Gervase Markham via dev-security-policy wrote: On 11/05/17 12:46, Rob Stradling wrote: There's a "Created by" field (Username, Timestamp) and a "Last Modified By" field (Username, Timestamp) in the CCADB, but neither of these fields are currently provided in the public CSV

Re: Hunting for intermediates that still haven't been disclosed to CCADB

2017-05-12 Thread Kurt Roeckx via dev-security-policy
On 2017-05-11 19:05, Gervase Markham wrote: On 11/05/17 12:46, Rob Stradling wrote: There's a "Created by" field (Username, Timestamp) and a "Last Modified By" field (Username, Timestamp) in the CCADB, but neither of these fields are currently provided in the public CSV reports that Mozilla

Re: Hunting for intermediates that still haven't been disclosed to CCADB

2017-05-11 Thread Gervase Markham via dev-security-policy
On 11/05/17 12:46, Rob Stradling wrote: > There's a "Created by" field (Username, Timestamp) and a "Last Modified > By" field (Username, Timestamp) in the CCADB, but neither of these > fields are currently provided in the public CSV reports that Mozilla > publishes. Rob: do you think you could

RE: Hunting for intermediates that still haven't been disclosed to CCADB

2017-05-11 Thread Ben Wilson via dev-security-policy
Both sets had been publicly disclosed through affirmative publishing in the repositories of the respective CAs--that's probably how your crawler found them, because I don't believe they are issuing SSL/TLS certificates. I thought I had disclosed the ones chaining to the DigiCert Orion Health

Re: Hunting for intermediates that still haven't been disclosed to CCADB

2017-05-11 Thread Rob Stradling via dev-security-policy
On 11/05/17 12:28, Kurt Roeckx via dev-security-policy wrote: On 2017-05-11 13:07, Rob Stradling wrote: It would seem that DigiCert noticed these 19 intermediates appear on https://crt.sh/mozilla-disclosures#undisclosed whilst I was asleep, because they've all now been disclosed to the CCADB.

Re: Hunting for intermediates that still haven't been disclosed to CCADB

2017-05-11 Thread Kurt Roeckx via dev-security-policy
On 2017-05-11 13:07, Rob Stradling wrote: It would seem that DigiCert noticed these 19 intermediates appear on https://crt.sh/mozilla-disclosures#undisclosed whilst I was asleep, because they've all now been disclosed to the CCADB. They should've been disclosed some time ago, however. Does