[dev-servo] JS engine (meeting notes)

2014-11-11 Thread Robert O'Callahan
https://github.com/servo/servo/wiki/Workweek-alt-js I'm pleased with the Table discussion until mid 2015 outcome :-). It might make sense at some point to have a super secure Servo build where you plug in a JS interpreter and simple GC written in Rust, but I can't see a viable general-purpose

Re: [dev-servo] JS engine (meeting notes)

2014-11-11 Thread Cameron Zwarich
On Nov 11, 2014, at 1:21 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote: https://github.com/servo/servo/wiki/Workweek-alt-js I'm pleased with the Table discussion until mid 2015 outcome :-). It might make sense at some point to have a super secure Servo build where you plug in a JS

Re: [dev-servo] JS engine (meeting notes)

2014-11-11 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Cameron Zwarich zwar...@mozilla.com wrote: On Nov 11, 2014, at 1:21 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote: https://github.com/servo/servo/wiki/Workweek-alt-js I'm pleased with the Table discussion until mid 2015 outcome :-). It might make

Re: [dev-servo] JS engine (meeting notes)

2014-11-11 Thread Andreas Gal
Proof-carrying code and type preserving compilation allow securing even fairly complex compiler optimizations to be done securely. Sprinkle process separation/isolation and lowered rights onto that and I don’t think fast JS has to be a significant security risk. Thanks, Andreas On Nov 11,

Re: [dev-servo] JS engine (meeting notes)

2014-11-11 Thread Andrew McCreight
- Original Message - https://github.com/servo/servo/wiki/Workweek-alt-js I'm pleased with the Table discussion until mid 2015 outcome :-). It might make sense at some point to have a super secure Servo build where you plug in a JS interpreter and simple GC written in Rust, but I