On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Josh Matthews
wrote:
> I don't believe anybody has put thought into addons beyond "something like
> Chrome" at this point.
FWIW https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1161828
Rob
--
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe ure
I don't believe anybody has put thought into addons beyond "something
like Chrome" at this point.
On 2015-07-23 6:05 PM, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
Partially related question: are there plans for per-add-on event queue?
On 21/07/15 16:31, Josh Matthews wrote:
We currently have a model wh
Partially related question: are there plans for per-add-on event queue?
On 21/07/15 16:31, Josh Matthews wrote:
> We currently have a model where each eTLD has a separate event queue.
> This is an improvement over Gecko (one event queue to rule them all),
> but I suspect we can do better. Specific
On 21/07/15 15:31, Josh Matthews wrote:
This appears to satisfy the requirements of the spec (c.f.
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/webappapis.html#processing-model-9 &
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/webappapis.html#task-source). My
main concern is the loss of deterministic orderin
We currently have a model where each eTLD has a separate event queue.
This is an improvement over Gecko (one event queue to rule them all),
but I suspect we can do better. Specifically, I'm interested in moving
to isolated event queues per document, then doing round-robin event
processing on ea
5 matches
Mail list logo
