Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote:
Actually I'm repackaging the browser for a study project that I'm
working on. As a part of this project, I need to repackage the browser
to import a CA root.
I think you need to be careful with doing stuff like this and still
using the Firefox branding.
Wan-Teh Chang wrote, On 2008-01-02 18:10:
On return,
you need to check that SSL_GetChannelInfo returned SECSuccess
and that the length field is = sizeof(SSLChannelInfo) (the size of
SSLChannelInfo when you compiled your code) before you can use
the value of any other field.
Why do you say
David Stutzman wrote:
I think you need to be careful with doing stuff like this and still
using the Firefox branding.
David, I absolutely agree with you on this! More than that, I made
Mozilla (via Gerv) aware of distributors of Firefox which don't comply
with the policy mentioned by you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 2007-12-30 23:58:
I have developed a XPCOM component.
[snip]
The problem is that it is not getting registered.
Arun,
Your question is really an XPCOM question and not an NSS or crypto
question. I think that the readers of this alias are not XPCOM
experts and
On Jan 3, 2008 12:21 PM, Nelson Bolyard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wan-Teh Chang wrote, On 2008-01-02 18:10:
On return,
you need to check that SSL_GetChannelInfo returned SECSuccess
and that the length field is = sizeof(SSLChannelInfo) (the size of
SSLChannelInfo when you compiled your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 2007-12-21 21:30:
[snip] I wanted to know the purpose of the macro
FULL_DUPLEX_CAPABLE how to enable it for my (Perhaps by setting it
to PR_TRUE, whatever.. while building the library...??)
That feature test macro appears in only one place in NSS.
6 matches
Mail list logo
