Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
I think this may only be true because of the involvement of PKCS5v2.
If PKCS5v2 was not part of the problem space, I would have said that
there was no need to use OIDs at all, none whatsoever. I would have
said that PK11_ interfaces exist that can do everything you need
Subrata Mazumdar wrote:
nsCOMPtrnsIPK11Token softToken;
rv = pkcs11Slot-GetToken(getter_AddRefs(softToken));
softToken-Login(PR_FALSE); // prompts for initializing password
. . .
softToken-Reset(); // expected that token/slot password would be in
the uninitialized state
Graham Leggett wrote:
Completeness I guess - xml-security's API allowed you to choose both
CBC and ECB modes, so I was trying to emulate the same thing.
The only mechanism that I cannot find an oid for is CKM_DES3_ECB - do
you know which SEC_OID_* macro I should be using?
The
Marcin T wrote:
Hi
I finally discovered what is the issue here. In appears that in case
of unsigned applets, the code is unable to access SunJCE provider
You need to spend your time on signing the applet correctly.
You really don't want to get unsigned applets working by modifying your
Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
Graham Leggett wrote, On 2008-09-06 12:51:
I think a big source of confusion is that everything is an OID, or
everything is a mechanism, but not all OID or mechanisms are relevant
for every situation, and this isn't clear from each function call.
I think this
As part of the work to include NSS in LSB 4.0, I created a list
of NSPR functions required for using the NSS SSL functions at
http://developer.mozilla.org/En/NSS_reference/NSPR_functions
I generated this list by inspecting the source code of libcurl,
nss_compat_ossl, mod_nss, and the NSS test
I'm pretty sure there are some things that can be done to put a TCP
socket into a state that's inappropriate for O_NONBLOCK mode, but I
can't think of any off the top of my head. Is there a reference
somewhere that lists the kinds of things that a programmer needs to
avoid? If there is, could
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Kyle Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pretty sure there are some things that can be done to put a TCP
socket into a state that's inappropriate for O_NONBLOCK mode, but I
can't think of any off the top of my head. Is there a reference
somewhere that lists
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Wan-Teh Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Kyle Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pretty sure there are some things that can be done to put a TCP
socket into a state that's inappropriate for O_NONBLOCK mode, but I
can't think of
9 matches
Mail list logo
