Re: Pending roots and EV enablements

On 05/19/2009 09:35 PM, Frank Hecker: Nelson B Bolyard wrote: Now, I don't want to set unrealistic expectations, so I must inform you that I have NO idea whether Mozilla Corporation will accept any additional NSS changes at this point or not. Three weeks ago, Bob Relyea and I wrote to MoCo p

Re: Pending roots and EV enablements

Nelson Bolyard wrote: I can't see WellsFargo at https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:Schedule#Requests_in_the_Inclusion_Phase Dunno about that. I consider the bug system authoritative. When Frank or Kathleen creates a bug asking for the work to be done in NSS or PSM, I consider that authoritative, whe

Re: Pending roots and EV enablements

Nelson B Bolyard wrote: Now, I don't want to set unrealistic expectations, so I must inform you that I have NO idea whether Mozilla Corporation will accept any additional NSS changes at this point or not. Three weeks ago, Bob Relyea and I wrote to MoCo powers-that-be asking about this, and we're

Re: Pending roots and EV enablements

On 14/05/09 00:38, Nelson B Bolyard wrote: I suppose that, on principle, you're right. In the past, I would have readily done so. But today my idealism is severely tempered by the pragmatic realization that there are now hundreds of open bugs and RFEs that I have filed, some years old, that hav

Re: failed to generate key using window.crypto.generateCRMFRequest() method

Subrata Mazumdar wrote: Thanks Wan-Teh for the suggestion. No, requiring custom version of Firefox to use ECC key based certificate enrollment is not realistic. It just does not seem right to disable access to all licensed ECC implementation just because Mozilla wants to disable the ECC implem