On 20/10/10 19:36, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
I think I'm responsible for (moderate) this group, and I only just learned
about this from this posting of yours. Nonetheless, I'm
quite happy for this group to be among your guinea pigs. Thanks.
Hi Nelson,
I'm sorry, I thought you were looped in
Unfortunately, Giganews had a problem switching the four groups to
moderated status. They are working on it, but in the mean time,
posts made via the news interface will not propagate to the mail and
Google Groups interfaces, for lack of approval stamps.
Therefore, if you read this group via
Hi there,
I´m trying to compile the JSS in the Windows 64 bits platform and I
have found many problems to do that.
I have seen many posts in the internet with many problems too.
I just want use the JSS and not compile it.
Could the Mozilla team publishs the JSS binaries (dll and jar)
compiled
On 10/20/2010 05:13 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601645.
The following internal functions and data structures in FreeBL that would be
used Firefox 4.0 Sync's J-PAKE implementation through JSCtypes (a mechanism
for calling native code through
On 20. 10. 2010 21:01, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
On 2010-10-20 09:54 PDT, Matej Kurpel wrote:
Hello,
I have set up my own CA and issued one certificate signed by this CA.
However, I cannot use this certificate to send signed e-mail from
Thunderbird. It says Could not verify this certificate for
On 10/20/2010 06:29 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
Brian Smith wrote:
(Because of Firefox Sync, we are now always going to have crypto
features that won't work in FIPS mode.)
Sigh, ignoring FIPS mode in a feature, is usually a red flag. It means
you are handling CSP's where you really
On 2010-10-20 17:13 PDT, Brian Smith wrote:
See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601645.
The following internal functions and data structures in FreeBL that
would be used Firefox 4.0 Sync's J-PAKE implementation through JSCtypes
(a mechanism for calling native code through
On 10/21/2010 05:53 PM, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
IMO, apart from the mundane technical issue of making hash and bignum
functions public, there are some bigger questions, such as:
- the wisdom of making Mozilla products even MORE dependent on shared
secrets and passwords than they already are,
8 matches
Mail list logo
