On 2014-06-30 02:35, Hubert Kario wrote:
The benefits of ECDHE outweigh the risks of using RC4,
I have to disagree here. Even 1024 bit DHE requires a targeted attack at ~80 bit
complexity. Currently we see RC4 at around 56 bit, with a completely unoptimized
attack...
Do you have a reference
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Brian Smith br...@briansmith.org wrote:
Hi
The issue is that the WebCrypto API uses a totally separate keystore from
the X.509 client certificate keystore (if it doesn't, it should be), and
the stuff that Red Hat does is about client certificates. AFAICT,
- Original Message -
From: Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be
To: mozilla-dev-tech-cry...@lists.mozilla.org
Sent: Monday, 30 June, 2014 10:56:13 AM
Subject: Re: Road to RC4-free web (the case for YouTube without RC4)
On 2014-06-30 02:35, Hubert Kario wrote:
The benefits of ECDHE outweigh
Am 27.06.2014 18:32, schrieb Brian Smith:
However, I think that is a good idea anyway, because Firefox (and
Thunderbird) should be using the native OS for client certificates and
S/MIME certificates anyway.
Additionally or exclusive?
When I think of using smartcard-based client certificates
- Original Message -
From: Brian Smith br...@briansmith.org
To: mozilla's crypto code discussion list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
Sent: Monday, 30 June, 2014 12:23:41 AM
Subject: Re: Road to RC4-free web (the case for YouTube without RC4)
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:18 AM,
5 matches
Mail list logo