On 11/2/09 01:59, Eddy Nigg wrote:
It's perhaps an opportunity for me to explain why I'm here and why I
think others - specially representatives and employees of CAs - should
too.
OK, invitation accepted! I'm here to get a couple of fixes spliced into
the Mozilla DNA:
1. add a
On 11/2/09 02:19, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
That's a very good question. The most important part of the answer to
it would have to be: don't discount what they say.
Right.
However, I have a suggested strategy for reviewers: don't limit your
review to only those trust bits that are initially
On 10/2/09 02:23, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
I'd post this in the policy working group, if that was operational ... :(
I also don't like this discussion about waiting for some perfect A-list
of tech. We've got the NNTP thing, we've got the ordinary mail, what
are we waiting on now?
On 10.02.2009 02:23, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
I'd post this in the policy working group, if that was operational ... :(
Inf790af94-3997-43b6-a5aa-a4d79119c...@s1g2000prg.googlegroups.com
our esteemed Kathleen Wilsonkathleen95...@yahoo.com wrote:
According to
On 02/10/2009 02:30 PM, Ben Bucksch:
Are you fearing that you are on holiday during that time and can't have
your voice?
We should recommend that people which have reviewed the CAs in question
say so after the comments period. Otherwise we don't know that somebody
at least took a look. For
On 02/10/2009 02:15 PM, Ian G:
I also don't like this discussion about waiting for some perfect A-list
of tech. We've got the NNTP thing, we've got the ordinary mail, what are
we waiting on now? google-phone? twitter?
Even though I don't care about google groups either (and google can
fetch
On 10/2/09 14:16, Eddy Nigg wrote:
On 02/10/2009 02:15 PM, Ian G:
I think -- personal likely biased opinion only -- you might get more
value by looking inside the foundation and asking them to expand the
resources available on the CA desk. Their job is to be independent, and
so far, that's
Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
While I do not wish in any way to question or reduce the value of
Kathleen's evaluation, I wonder if it is right for us to allow CA
applications to be approved in the absence of any real public discussion.
As Ben pointed out, there was opportunity for public discussion,
Ian G wrote:
I think -- personal likely biased opinion only -- you might get more
value by looking inside the foundation and asking them to expand the
resources available on the CA desk.
Right now between Kathleen, myself, and Johnathan Nightingale (e.g., his
CAB Forum activities) we have
On 02/10/2009 09:42 PM, Frank Hecker:
And in any case, I don't see people being as much concerned about having
more Mozilla-employed people involved, but as getting more community
feedback. And I don't have any good answers there because it depends on
having more people willing to volunteer
On 10/2/09 23:02, Eddy Nigg wrote:
On 02/10/2009 09:42 PM, Frank Hecker:
And in any case, I don't see people being as much concerned about having
more Mozilla-employed people involved, but as getting more community
feedback. And I don't have any good answers there because it depends on
having
That's a very good question. The most important part of the answer to
it would have to be: don't discount what they say.
However, I have a suggested strategy for reviewers: don't limit your
review to only those trust bits that are initially requested. This
way, if there is an amendment to the
Kyle Hamilton wrote:
I'm asking this because I think a template which includes a statement
of requirements would be an exceedingly good thing for people
undertaking reviews for Mozilla CA program inclusion -- and would open
up the process to people who have less interior working knowledge of a
I'd post this in the policy working group, if that was operational ... :(
In f790af94-3997-43b6-a5aa-a4d79119c...@s1g2000prg.googlegroups.com
our esteemed Kathleen Wilson kathleen95...@yahoo.com wrote:
According to https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:How_to_apply
“If there are no open issues or action
Thank you for bringing this up, Nelson. I would hope that your
observation (as a much larger figure in the Mozilla organization than
I or Eddy or much of anyone else) and worry will carry more weight
than the people outside the inner circle.
-Kyle H
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Nelson B
On 02/10/2009 03:23 AM, Nelson B Bolyard:
While I do not wish in any way to question or reduce the value of
Kathleen's evaluation, I wonder if it is right for us to allow CA
applications to be approved in the absence of any real public discussion.
In the complete absence of any discussion,
16 matches
Mail list logo
