Re: S/MIME Encryption Certificate without email address

2011-03-22 Thread Robert Relyea
On 03/22/2011 03:09 PM, silent...@gmail.com wrote: > Thank you for the reply! > > On Mar 22, 7:00 pm, Robert Relyea wrote: >> Unless there is an authoritative way to bind the cert to a given email >> address, there is no way to use those certs for email. If you want email >> certs to interoperate

Re: S/MIME Encryption Certificate without email address

2011-03-22 Thread silent...@gmail.com
Thank you for the reply! On Mar 22, 7:00 pm, Robert Relyea wrote: > Unless there is an authoritative way to bind the cert to a given email > address, there is no way to use those certs for email. If you want email > certs to interoperate with people from outside of the infrastructure, > the only

Re: S/MIME Encryption Certificate without email address

2011-03-22 Thread Nelson B Bolyard
On 2011/03/22 02:23 PDT, silent...@gmail.com wrote: > Well, the reasons are at least obvious to us :) - the card is supposed > to be in use for least 5 years. Card owners (Health Care Providers in > our case) should be able to use various email providers for exchanging > medical reports. Nothing

Re: S/MIME Encryption Certificate without email address

2011-03-22 Thread Robert Relyea
On 03/22/2011 02:23 AM, silent...@gmail.com wrote: > Well, the reasons are at least obvious to us :) - the card is supposed > to be in use for least 5 years. Card owners (Health Care Providers in > our case) should be able to use various email providers for exchanging > medical reports. The email p

Re: S/MIME Encryption Certificate without email address

2011-03-22 Thread silent...@gmail.com
Well, the reasons are at least obvious to us :) - the card is supposed to be in use for least 5 years. Card owners (Health Care Providers in our case) should be able to use various email providers for exchanging medical reports. The email providers will be not gmail or yahoo, of course, but still t