Thanks Wan-Teh.
- Original Message -
> From: "Wan-Teh Chang"
> To: "mozilla's crypto code discussion list"
>
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:57:29 AM
> Subject: Re: Review of changes to the HTTP spec
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Brian Smith
> wrote:
> > HTTPbis seems to b
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Brian Smith wrote:
> HTTPbis seems to be in its final stages. Although it is supposed to be a
> somewhat minor revision, quite significant changes have been made to
> the spec. We should review the changes and make sure we provide our
> feedback before it is too la
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:15:51AM -0500, John Dennis wrote:
> On 01/19/2012 07:26 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >He is talking about runtime detection. Not build time detection. And we
> >already have --with-system-nss. My point is that it's probably not worth
> >trying to do runtime detection because
On 01/19/2012 07:26 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
He is talking about runtime detection. Not build time detection. And we
already have --with-system-nss. My point is that it's probably not worth
trying to do runtime detection because few systems will have the right
system nss anyways.
I've been lurkin
Eitan Adler wrote:
> Brian Smith wrote:
> > If the system NSS isn't new enough, then Firefox's local version of
> > NSS would be used.
>
> From a packager point of view, please don't automagically detect
> these things. If the system NSS is supported provide an option
> --with-system-nss which if
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 06:52:26AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Brian Smith wrote:
> > Mike Hommey wrote:
> >> But linux users are not necessarily up-to-date with the latest NSS. I
> >> seriously doubt the number of users with the very last system nss
> >> exceeds 1
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Brian Smith wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
>> But linux users are not necessarily up-to-date with the latest NSS. I
>> seriously doubt the number of users with the very last system nss
>> exceeds 10% of the linux user base except in exceptional "good
>> timing" cases
I think that we should start some documentation (e.g. a wiki) that documents
the differences between our implementation and other browsers' implementations,
along with a justification for the difference and/or a link to a bug about
resolving the difference.
Examples of differences, off the top
HTTPbis seems to be in its final stages. Although it is supposed to be a
somewhat minor revision, quite significant changes have been made to the spec.
We should review the changes and make sure we provide our feedback before it is
too late. In particular, if there is some change that we think w
Mike Hommey wrote:
> But linux users are not necessarily up-to-date with the latest NSS. I
> seriously doubt the number of users with the very last system nss
> exceeds 10% of the linux user base except in exceptional "good
> timing" cases (like when ubuntu is released with the latest version),
> b
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:45:02PM -0800, Brian Smith wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > In the long run, for performance reasons, we should probably prefer
> > > the system NSS libraries to our own, whenever the system NSS
> > > libraries are available and are the right version, because at
> > > le
11 matches
Mail list logo
