On 11/30/2015 12:07 PM, Julien Vehent wrote:
On 2015-11-30 12:47, Robert Relyea wrote:
I've always found the 128 bit prioritized over 256 a silly
recommendation, I support reordering.
Can you expand on why you think it is silly?
The argument went that 128 bit was 'sufficient' and there was
Julien Vehent wrote:
> The original thread [1] had a long discussion on this topic. The DJB batch
> attack redefines the landscape, but does not address the original concerns
> around AES-256 resistance. To me, the main question is to verify whether
> AES-256
On 11/25/2015 02:01 PM, April King wrote:
My colleague Julien Vehent and I are in the process of updating the
Mozilla Server Side TLS documentation:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS
One of the topics of conversation was whether or not the Modern TLS
configuration should
On 2015-11-30 12:47, Robert Relyea wrote:
I've always found the 128 bit prioritized over 256 a silly
recommendation, I support reordering.
Can you expand on why you think it is silly?
The original thread [1] had a long discussion on this topic. The DJB
batch attack redefines the landscape,
4 matches
Mail list logo