How to Renew a Expired Self signed CA certificate

2011-10-31 Thread mallapadi niranjan
Hi all I would like to know how to renew a self singed CA (RootCA) certificate through certutil. I followed the below procedure to create a self signed CA cert. $certutil -N -d . $certutil -S -d . -n testCA -s CN=testCA,O=Example.COM,C=US -t CT,, -x -2 -m -v 1 -t CT,, snip $certutil -L

tstclnt exit code: do we really need to distinguish between failures during PR_Send and PR_Recv?

2011-10-31 Thread Brian Smith
I am modifying tstclnt to test my patch for bug 542832. With my patch, tstclnt always succeeds or fails like it did before, but in some of the failure cases it exits with exit code 1 when the testcase expects it to exit with exit code 254, and sometimes it exits with exit code 254 when the

Re: Recent builds of NSS on Windows?

2011-10-31 Thread Brian Smith
helpcrypto helpcrypto wrote: and, has anyone achieved to compile it using mingw? im always having many issues with that... MozillaBuild is pretty much mingw. Please post the errors you receive during your build and I will try to help you decipher them. Cheers, Brian -- dev-tech-crypto

How to Renew a Expired Self signed CA certificate

2011-10-31 Thread Niranjan M.R
Hi all I have created a self signed CA Certificate using the below procedure $certutil -S -d foo -n testCA0 -s CN=testCA0,o=Example,Inc.,C=IN - t CT,, -x -2 -m -v 1 -t CT,, The above CA certificate expires in 1 month, I would like to know what is the procedure to renew the Certificate

Re: tstclnt exit code: do we really need to distinguish between failures during PR_Send and PR_Recv?

2011-10-31 Thread Robert Relyea
On 10/31/2011 01:45 AM, Brian Smith wrote: I am modifying tstclnt to test my patch for bug 542832. With my patch, tstclnt always succeeds or fails like it did before, but in some of the failure cases it exits with exit code 1 when the testcase expects it to exit with exit code 254, and

Re: tstclnt exit code: do we really need to distinguish between failures during PR_Send and PR_Recv?

2011-10-31 Thread Brian Smith
Robert Relyea wrote: That being said, I suspect that we currently don't distinguish between these two, and wind up with a false success on expected client auth failure cases when the server is down. In practice that's not too much of a problem because several of the other tests in the suite