On Fri, 1 May 2015, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:35 +0100, Alan Braggins wrote:
On 30/04/15 17:56, David Woodhouse wrote:
Has anyone looked at implementing RFC7512 support, allowing an object
to be specified by a PKCS#11 URI?
I don't suppose you know why RFC 7512 uses
Posting to mozilla-dev-tech-crypto instead. firefox-dev to bcc.
On Apr 27, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Michael Peterson michaelpeterson...@gmail.com
wrote:
Firefox does not like our internal certificates. I'm trying to figure out
why...
tl;dr - Our internal IIS servers, signed with our
On Friday 01 May 2015 12:11:00 Tanvi Vyas wrote:
On Apr 27, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Michael Peterson
michaelpeterson...@gmail.com wrote:
Firefox does not like our internal certificates. I'm trying to figure out
why...
tl;dr - Our internal IIS servers, signed with our internal CA,
On 05/03/2015 02:17 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 18:33 -0700, Jan Pechanec wrote:
On Fri, 1 May 2015, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:35 +0100, Alan Braggins wrote:
On 30/04/15 17:56, David Woodhouse wrote:
Has anyone looked at implementing RFC7512
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Tanvi Vyas tv...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Apr 27, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Michael Peterson
michaelpeterson...@gmail.com wrote:
Now, in the album I posted above (https://imgur.com/a/dmMdG), the last
two screenshots show a packet capture from Wireshark. It appears that
On 05/04/2015 10:09 AM, Brian Smith wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Tanvi Vyas tv...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Apr 27, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Michael Peterson
michaelpeterson...@gmail.com wrote:
Now, in the album I posted above (https://imgur.com/a/dmMdG), the last
two screenshots show a
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 09:21 -0700, Robert Relyea wrote:
So in NSS, CKA_LABEL is simply a short cut to CKA_SUBJECT. That is NSS
looks up a cert from the nickname and picks all the certs that match
that cert's subject.
Hm... so if I have two certificates; one with:
CKA_SUBJECT: My CA
On Mon, May 4, 2015 1:25 pm, David Woodhouse wrote:
Surely that's not unique? Using the above example, surely the first
certificate issued by the 2010 instance of 'My CA', and the first
certificate issued by the 2015 instance, are both going to have
identical CKA_ISSUER and
On Mon, May 4, 2015 1:25 pm, David Woodhouse wrote:
Surely that's not unique? Using the above example, surely the first
certificate issued by the 2010 instance of 'My CA', and the first
certificate issued by the 2015 instance, are both going to have
identical CKA_ISSUER and
9 matches
Mail list logo
