On 04/11/2017 07:34 PM, Jason Orendorff wrote:
I have no plans to type in my notes from the JS meeting. If you want them,
ping me on IRC. But one thing I want to think about is how we decide what
to work on, especially performance work. Today, it's like this:
- If you're a volunteer, of course y
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Jason Orendorff
wrote:
> I have no plans to type in my notes from the JS meeting. If you want them,
> ping me on IRC. But one thing I want to think about is how we decide what
> to work on, especially performance work. Today, it's like this:
>
> - If you're a vol
On 04/12/2017 06:55 AM, Kannan Vijayan wrote:
It's possible to expose in the profiler UI, although the granularity
might be too high and skew might be an issue. Really this is more of a
telemetry-style metric - we can accumulate counts for how often
fallbacks are hit (or how often we generalize
It's possible to expose in the profiler UI, although the granularity might
be too high and skew might be an issue. Really this is more of a
telemetry-style metric - we can accumulate counts for how often fallbacks
are hit (or how often we generalize into a polymorphic stub) and report
that as a si
On 2017-04-12 5:33 AM, Jan de Mooij wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Steve Fink wrote:
>
>> The juxtaposition of telemetry and the IC logger makes me wonder -- is it,
>> or could it be, lightweight enough to report on via telemetry? It would be
>> pretty cool to be able to drive work of
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Steve Fink wrote:
> The juxtaposition of telemetry and the IC logger makes me wonder -- is it,
> or could it be, lightweight enough to report on via telemetry? It would be
> pretty cool to be able to drive work off of what the bulk of our users
> could make use o
On 04/11/2017 02:05 PM, Jan de Mooij wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Jason Orendorff
wrote:
- Bigger projects, like Waldo's work on parsing and djvj et al's work on GC
scheduling, are undertaken when we have stuff that has been showing up on
profiles "forever". This kind of work isn't
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Jason Orendorff
wrote:
> - Bigger projects, like Waldo's work on parsing and djvj et al's work on GC
> scheduling, are undertaken when we have stuff that has been showing up on
> profiles "forever". This kind of work isn't driven by any one particular
> measuremen
I have no plans to type in my notes from the JS meeting. If you want them,
ping me on IRC. But one thing I want to think about is how we decide what
to work on, especially performance work. Today, it's like this:
- If you're a volunteer, of course you decide what to pick up—we're just
glad you're
9 matches
Mail list logo
