Congrats on landing! Looking forward to seeing this used in the devtools!
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Shu-yu Guo wrote:
> Greetings, fellow subtrahend incrementers!
>
> I recently landed bug 1030389 to track the high-level optimizations
> decisions
> (i.e., deciding what MIR is emitted) made
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Jason Orendorff
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Jason Hill
> wrote:
>
> > 1 - Is it possible to update an object properties created on the JS land
> ?
> > What I need to do is that setting private data / data slot into any
> Object
> > created on the J
Hi everyone!
Friendly PSA: sometimes you're debugging a "leak" where the GC considers
something reachable and therefore won't collect it, and this happens at an
inopportune time for using the devtools memory panel (eg right before a
DESTROY_RUNTIME collection), so you can't use the nice GUI for vi
uses this?
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Nick Fitzgerald > wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone!
>>
>> Friendly PSA: sometimes you're debugging a "leak" where the GC considers
>> something reachable and therefore won't collect it, and this happen
If we are going to leave bool behind, I think we should use something
Rustic:
template
class MOZ_MUST_USE_TYPE Result : public mozilla::Variant
{
public:
// Helper methods here...
explicit operator bool () { return is(); }
// Etc...
};
Or, if we don't want to boil too many ocean
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Steve Fink wrote:
> On 05/11/2016 02:42 AM, Ms2ger wrote:
>
>> On 11/05/16 08:36, Jim Blandy wrote:
>>
>>> It looks like the lack of any CI of the SM-only distribution is a
>>> non-trivial source of pain. That seems independent of where the Rust
>>> JSAPI
>>> bind
You may have seen some bug mail for
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=956899 and its dependent bugs.
Well, the migration off of NSPR threading is almost complete! Please don't
introduce any more uses of NSPR threading or jslock.h, and if you're
reviewing a patch, don't r+ any new uses.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Ehsan Akhgari
wrote:
> On 2016-08-15 2:15 PM, Nick Fitzgerald wrote:
> > You may have seen some bug mail for
> > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=956899 and its dependent
> bugs.
> > Well, the migration off of NSPR thre
actual NSPR headers or
vm/PosixNSPR.h).
Happy hacking!
Nick
[0]
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=mozilla-inbound&revision=4b6f61ea7594ae263945c95fc652d1aaad01042b
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1295741
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Nick Fitzgerald
w
I was under the impression that NSPR threading in particular (and not the
rest of NSPR) was one of the biggest reasons why --disable-shared-js was
broken. I think we should be able to statically link NSPR inside js now.
See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1275639#c13 and that whole
di
We could probably switch to V8's stack string format and save you some
trouble.
* V8's format is more human readable
* Error().stack's format is not constrained by any standard, so in theory
changing it is web compatible...
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Ehsan Akhgari
wrote:
> I'd like to em
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Ehsan Akhgari
wrote:
> On 2016-09-27 5:44 PM, Bobby Holley wrote:
> > I heard some years ago that there exist websites which sniffs UAs and
> > invokes separate stack parsing routines for each browser. I have no idea
> > if we'd hit significant breakage in practi
What an exciting time!
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Brian Hackett
wrote:
>
> To help avoid threading bugs during and after this transition,
>
> bug
> 1325050 also adds a ProtectedData class, which is a template that can
> be used on class fields to specify the conditions under which the
>
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 2:17 AM, Nicolas B. Pierron <
nicolas.b.pier...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Also, as much good as I think of perf-html, we should be careful of what
> we expose in perf-html. Remember that all users of perf-html are not Jit
> experts, and that even exposing small information suc
(cc dev-servo, dev-platfrom; reply to js-engine-internals)
Hello everyone!
The Rust bindings to SpiderMonkey that Servo uses just landed in
mozilla-inbound[0]! You can monitor their test results on taskcluster as
the `SM-tc[tier-2](rust)` job.
If any of your patches break these tests, please pin
There's also `ddbug`[0] for dumping layouts, but while such tools are
useful, its annoying to be staring at a struct definition and not know what
data members exist because their definitions interspersed with methods...
[0] https://github.com/philipc/ddbug
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Lars Ha
16 matches
Mail list logo
