+1
I checked:
* signatures, hashes
* full ITs
* bin tarball's lib directory matches what's in the Maven repo
* src tarball matches git commit
Will close the vote momentarily.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 10:41 AM Dominic Garguilo
wrote:
>
> +1
>
> * verified hashes
> * built from tar with no
+1
* verified hashes
* built from tar with no errors
* ran all tests and ITs (only failure was the known
flaky MemoryStarvedScanIT)
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 4:18 AM Christopher wrote:
> Accumulo Developers,
>
> Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 3.0.0.
>
> Git Commit:
>
+1
- verified hashes
- verified sunny ITs
- verified unit tests
- built with Uno and verified basic functionality
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 7:07 PM Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Some of the things I did for verification/testing locally:
>
> *
+1 (binding)
Some of the things I did for verification/testing locally:
* Validated signatures and checksums
* Verified license and notice files in archives
* Verified source license headers with 'mvn apache-rat:check'
* Built and ran all the sunny integration tests
* Started up using Uno to
+1
* verified signatures and hashes
* built from source tarball with no issues
* Sunny day tests passed
* Started instance locally. Ran ci until the disk was almost full. Ran
scan, walk, batchwalk with no issues.
* Looked at diff between 3.0 and 2.1 to look for changes that were not in
the
+1
* Verified signatures
* Built from tar with no errors (including errorprone)
* Sunny tests passed
* Started an uno instances and did some spot checks
* Verified no unexpected exception in the log files
Ed Coleman
From: Christopher
Date: Monday, August 14, 2023 at
