GitHub user franz1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2097
ARTEMIS-1876 InVMNodeManager shouldn't be used if no JDBC HA is configured
(cherry picked from commit f886c0bdb451c947143fba6cf07cbf8ce7f3ff4d)
You can merge this pull request into a
If its being linked to later I'd just put it in a subdir of the
website. I'd do that even before/during the vote so it isnt
complicating the final release steps as it did this time.
Alternatively, or if it isnt being linked to later, at least moving it
to a different subdir of the dist dev area
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2096
---
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2096
@andytaylor The tests seems fine to me, so it is ok :+1:
---
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2093#discussion_r189874889
--- Diff:
artemis-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/api/core/SimpleString.java
---
@@ -150,6 +150,10 @@ public
I'm pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ Artemis 2.6.0
Downloads are now available at:
http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/download.html
For a complete list of updates:
http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/release-notes-2.6.0.html
A detailed list of git commits:
Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2093#discussion_r189859957
--- Diff:
artemis-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/api/core/SimpleString.java
---
@@ -150,6 +150,10 @@ public CharSequence
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2093
@jbertram fixed checkstyle introduced in last change, to address franz's
review comment.
---
What I meant was the project itself..
It's currently living on my github fork. I don't have an issue with it
living on my page only.. I was just checking if anyone want a better
home for it.
I will add a step (tomorrow) on how to generate the report.
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Robbie
Ah, I thought you meant the reports themselves.
I dont see an issue with it being where it is, most of the tools we
use come from other places, but it might be simple to use if it was in
the website repo or dist dev area, alongside where the output is being
generated.
On 22 May 2018 at 14:47,
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2093
Looks like a checkstyle violation.
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2097
@franz1981 close this PR.. it was merged with a rebase.. IDs were changed.
---
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2093
This looks good to me. @clebertsuconic, what do you think?
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2093
I took a day off after the release:) If you are happy with it feel free to
merge it. We can amend later if anything is failing.
Or I can merge later tonight or tomorrow
GitHub user RagnarPaulson opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/1
AMQNET-576: Clean out old code base for NMS AMQP client provider.
The first step to replacing the NMS AMQP client with a fully managed client
based on AMQPNetLite is to remove the
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2098
ARTEMIS-1873 STOMP heartbeater left alive on cxn destroy
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2098
I've got a test I want to add to this so don't merged it yet.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2098
---
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2098
Test has been added. Please review and merge.
---
How does the this version relate to the Apache ActiveMQ Artemis versioning? Is
there a mapping, or is it completely separate from Artemis? We are evaluating
Artemis; so are wondering.
Thanks,
Anindya Haldar
Oracle Marketing Cloud
> On May 22, 2018, at 11:34 AM, Christopher Shannon
>
Hi everyone,
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce that Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.4
has been released.
A list of issues resolved in this release is available here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12342685
The Wiki page for the release is here:
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2093
Ill have a look i think i know what it is (need to add filter check at same
point as exists check and should be super simple.
---
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2093
Should be sorted now.
Added checks for address and filterstring at along side checking the queue
exists.
Ive run locally SharedConsumerTest you mentioned and
GitHub user franz1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2096
ARTEMIS-1876 InVMNodeManager shouldn't be used if no JDBC HA is configured
When database persistence and no shared store option is being used,
Artemis is choosing to use
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2096
@andytaylor It is causing several regressions on Oracle tests, so it needs
to be ported on 1.x as well.
ATM I'm waiting the tests to finish and I will push it for 1.x as well
---
25 matches
Mail list logo
