Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2237#discussion_r209381661
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/management/impl/QueueControlImpl.java
---
@@ -711,6 +712,32
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2235
@mtaylor / @andytaylor no JIRA?
---
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2237#discussion_r209312787
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/management/impl/QueueControlImpl.java
---
@@ -711,6 +712,32
Github user ArthurFritz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2237#discussion_r209314996
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/management/impl/QueueControlImpl.java
---
@@ -711,6 +712,32 @@
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2237#discussion_r209315364
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/management/impl/QueueControlImpl.java
---
@@ -711,6 +712,32
Github user ArthurFritz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2237#discussion_r209317077
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/management/impl/QueueControlImpl.java
---
@@ -711,6 +712,32 @@
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2237#discussion_r209317084
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/management/impl/QueueControlImpl.java
---
@@ -711,6 +712,32
Github user ArthurFritz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2237#discussion_r209317397
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/management/impl/QueueControlImpl.java
---
@@ -711,6 +712,32 @@
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2237#discussion_r209369043
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/management/impl/QueueControlImpl.java
---
@@ -711,6 +712,32
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2237
@ArthurFritz i sent your branch a PR with a number of improvements on this,
see here: https://github.com/ArthurFritz/activemq-artemis/pull/1
---
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2238
ARTEMIS-2023 Support 1x prefixes for JMS dests created using session
In some cases users who migrate from 1.x to 2.x may still want to keep
the legacy prefixes for their JMS
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2237#discussion_r209369424
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/management/impl/QueueControlImpl.java
---
@@ -711,6 +712,32
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2237#discussion_r209373519
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/management/impl/QueueControlImpl.java
---
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2237#discussion_r209375108
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/management/impl/QueueControlImpl.java
---
@@ -711,6 +712,32
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2237#discussion_r209386511
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/management/QueueControlTest.java
---
@@
GitHub user michaelandrepearce opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2239
ARTEMIS-2022 Create count messages 'group by' this property filter
Checking build
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user michaelandrepearce closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2239
---
GitHub user ArthurFritz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2236
[ARTEMIS-2022] Create count messages 'group by' this property filter
Create a new function this is responsibility count messages determined
property filter, e return one object in
Github user ArthurFritz closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2236
---
Github user ArthurFritz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2236
Alter destination feature.
---
GitHub user ArthurFritz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2237
[ARTEMIS-2022] Create count messages 'group by' this property filter
Create a new function this is responsibility count messages determined
property filter, e return one object in
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2235
I will push -f without this commit.. it should have had a JIRA
---
Hi everyone,
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce that Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.5
has been released.
A list of issues resolved in this release is available here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12343307
The Wiki page for the release is here:
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2237
This should probably filter using the selectors logic, rather than some
seperate logic, so the fiktering expectations are the same.
---
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2237#discussion_r209312103
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/management/impl/QueueControlImpl.java
---
@@ -711,6 +712,32
The openwire generator is executed by the activemq-client project when the "
openwire-generate" build profile is enabled and the "antrun:run" goal is
executed (according to the comments in the pom):
mvn -P openwire-generate antrun:run
This runs a complex script that appears to ultimately boil
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2236
2.6.x is bug fixes only... this has to go on master.
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2236
even if it was going on 2.6.x, we first send to master, than cherry-pick
into 2.6.x
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2235
will leave it as it is.
---
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2237#discussion_r209381476
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/management/impl/QueueControlImpl.java
---
@@ -711,6 +712,32
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2199
@michaelandrepearce good point! I will need to modify it because my
solution do not create any ByteBuffer at all (or will dispose it immediately
with Asyncio) and the test proposed
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2199
@clebertsuconic I think that using a near-to-deprecation feature to solve
the issue can be avoided:
https://github.com/franz1981/activemq-artemis/tree/mmap_ro_2_read_journal
It is a
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2199
@franz1981 , @morefuntang provided a testcase to reproduce the issue, i
note on your branch you havent copied the test, to prove your alternative
change also would fix the
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2232
Itâs already on 2.6.x
---
GitHub user mtaylor opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2235
Make JDBC OpenFile Thread Safe
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/mtaylor/activemq-artemis OpenFileSync
Alternatively
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2232
So we have no idea of the cause, it is a consumer so we think its a
producer where producee maybe on older version. It happend 4 times since monday
our app team said
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2235
---
Github user mtaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2232
@michaelandrepearce How did they do this? It's really only legitimate if
the SimpleString is encoded incorrectly? i.e. Set the first 4 bytes as
something like Integer.MAX. Other checks
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2232
@mtaylor i giggle, its like there are forces out there that just know,
literally came into work today, and one of our app teams just experienced this
issue this morning...
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2232
@clebertsuconic can this be ported to the 2.6.x branch?
---
I will have to postpone to Monday...
I have started working on a compatibility issue between 1.5 and 2.x
that I want to make sure before we release.
Meanwhile: I have cut a master git report, where I added a XREF of
commits on 2.6.x
this is a current list I just cut of master versus 2.6.x,
41 matches
Mail list logo