Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2181
---
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2401
I'm considering the proposal of @clebertsuconic to allow management
messages to avoid paging AN`D `global-max-size` too, considering that they
won't queue up and they are necessary to
Github user feuillemorte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2410
@tadayosi could you review it please?
---
GitHub user franz1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2411
ARTEMIS-2162 Remove -XX:+AggressiveOpts to improve JDK 11 compatibility
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
GitHub user feuillemorte opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2410
ARTEMIS-2125 Tabs preference changes to display columns not persistent
through page refresh
Fix based on
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2373
Not all
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2181
@clebertsuconic @jbertram Guys if is good is possible to merge it? :+1:
---
Github user mtaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2401
@clebertsuconic I was thinking at this at a more general higher level, but
given that management methods are as you say, never queued, then they don't
take up storage. So, yes let's just
GitHub user michaelandrepearce opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2412
DO NOT MERGE
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/michaelandrepearce/activemq-artemis
SingleIterator
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2408
---
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2412
Me playing ;) dont merge
---
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2401
If thats the case, then great its just like invoking a method but just via
core protocol. The bit im now a little confused by then is why in @franz1981 pr
is it having to
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2401
@franz1981 / @michaelandrepearce : Management messages exist to manage the
broker. they are passed right into QueueController and are not queued.
Hence they should not be
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2401
@clebertsuconic I will open a new PR in the weekend fixing it in the
suggested way :+1:
---
GitHub user clebertsuconic opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2413
NO-JIRA fixing tests
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/clebertsuconic/activemq-artemis fixTest
Alternatively
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2401
@michaelandrepearce that's a good point: indeed I will work on a different
solution (much easier) trying to not involve at all any
PageStore/PageSubscription with management addresses.
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2412
What is this? :)
---
16 matches
Mail list logo
