[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.1 release

2021-01-14 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Hi everyone, I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.1 to your vote. This release includes several fixes (runtime configuration plugin with JDK9+, Karaf features, harden deserialization, …), improvements (new scheduler counters on JMX, avoiding several NPE, …), and updates (commons*, Shiro, jetty, …).

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimal JDK on ActiveMQ Artemis...

2021-01-14 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
+1 for me. Regards JB > Le 14 janv. 2021 à 18:45, Clebert Suconic a écrit > : > > Can I assume Lazy Consensus and move ahead on requiring JDK 11 as a > minimal requirement to build and run Artemis and its clients? > > > Users can always use older versions if they still need JDK 8. > > On

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimal JDK on ActiveMQ Artemis...

2021-01-14 Thread Clebert Suconic
Can I assume Lazy Consensus and move ahead on requiring JDK 11 as a minimal requirement to build and run Artemis and its clients? Users can always use older versions if they still need JDK 8. On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 11:35 AM Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose requiring JDK 11

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimal JDK on ActiveMQ Artemis...

2021-01-14 Thread Justin Bertram
It may be a little surprising to users to have the minimum Java version bumped in a minor release, but there is precedent for such a move. From ActiveMQ 5.15.9 to 5.15.10 the minimum Java version was bumped to 8. Most users are probably already on 11+ so I'm OK with it. Justin On Tue, Jan 12,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimal JDK on ActiveMQ Artemis...

2021-01-14 Thread Christopher Shannon
+1 from me, JDK 11 has been around a couple years now so I think it's fine. It would be nice to be able to use some of the new language features in the broker. On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 2:28 PM Timothy Bish wrote: > On 1/12/21 11:35 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimal JDK on ActiveMQ Artemis...

2021-01-14 Thread Francesco Nigro
+1 !! Il giorno gio 14 gen 2021 alle ore 20:33 Christopher Shannon < christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > +1 from me, JDK 11 has been around a couple years now so I think it's fine. > > It would be nice to be able to use some of the new language features in the > broker. > > On Thu,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimal JDK on ActiveMQ Artemis...

2021-01-14 Thread Timothy Bish
On 1/12/21 11:35 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote: I would like to propose requiring JDK 11 as a minimal requirement on ActiveMQ Artemis on master, to be released as 2.17 +1 JDK 8 is about end of life, and that would open up better possibilities on what we write in Artemis. JDK 8 is pretty old at

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.1 release

2021-01-14 Thread Matt Pavlovich
+1 [x] Performed full build + ran unit tests on the 5.16.1 tag [x] Ran two internal test suites validating ActiveMQ functionality using the artifacts from the staging repository Great work JB! > On Jan 14, 2021, at 8:51 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimal JDK on ActiveMQ Artemis...

2021-01-14 Thread Havret
Finally! +1 On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 8:52 PM Francesco Nigro wrote: > +1 !! > > Il giorno gio 14 gen 2021 alle ore 20:33 Christopher Shannon < > christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > +1 from me, JDK 11 has been around a couple years now so I think it's > fine. > > > > It would be