Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1452
Ok so happy we merge this, then, i assume. With he jproton and qpid-jms
bits merged already, i would be keen for this to make it in, before tagging of
2.3.0.
---
If your
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1452
You did already good :)
I was talking about my previous work on that class
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1452
Or do you mean should we make it a static method and then invoke that?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1452
@franz1981 it is just copy paste of the code that was in the util in
previous version before it was removed so code length is the same
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1452
Seems ok to me! Looking at the code I've written some time ago I probably
need to check if every method is inlined or not...some methods look very long!!!
---
If your project is set up
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1452
@clebertsuconic this is ready.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
