[GitHub] ant-ivy pull request #:

2018-02-27 Thread twogee
Github user twogee commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/commit/1a19f2f836cd33a25d458ed8ba9bbb3c7ce4ff96#commitcomment-27816643 Could we do release and sign in one go by adding distributions to ivy.xml and using a separate filesystem resolver to copy and

Re: Ivy release instructions

2018-02-27 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-02-27, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > The first round of this might not be publicly usable and we might have > to redo the steps as and when we fix things in the release process. So > maybe we should attempt an intermediate release before doing a 2.5.0. As long as we stop before pushing anything

Re: Ivy release this month?

2018-02-27 Thread Gintautas Grigelionis
Frankly, I was doubtful about the classloader change. But, what use cases are there for java -jar ivy.jar -main ? As I understand it, it's about resolving an artifact and lauching whatever main class would be there in it. So, why not bootstrapping an Ivy build in a fancy way? But, the new

[GitHub] ant-ivy pull request #67: IVY-1483 Invoke Ant through Ivy;

2018-02-27 Thread twogee
Github user twogee commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/67#discussion_r171054211 --- Diff: ivy.xml --- @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ + --- End diff -- Ah, I get it... the way things

Re: Ant 1.9.10 and Ivy

2018-02-27 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-02-27, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > More specifically, that's Ant 1.10.2 thing... so, one more regression in > master, I suppose. 1.10.1 and 1.9.10 work fine. > Gintas > 2018-02-27 20:23 GMT+01:00 Gintautas Grigelionis : >> After Ant dependency in Ivy was

Ant 1.9.10 and Ivy

2018-02-27 Thread Gintautas Grigelionis
After Ant dependency in Ivy was updated to 1.9.10, I'm getting [javac] /Users/gintas/Projects/ant-ivy-asf/src/java/org/apache/ivy/ant/IvyCacheFileset.java:206: error: clone() in EmptyFileSet cannot override clone() in FileSet [javac] public Object clone() { [javac]

Re: Ant 1.9.10 and Ivy

2018-02-27 Thread Gintautas Grigelionis
More specifically, that's Ant 1.10.2 thing... so, one more regression in master, I suppose. 1.10.1 and 1.9.10 work fine. Gintas 2018-02-27 20:23 GMT+01:00 Gintautas Grigelionis : > After Ant dependency in Ivy was updated to 1.9.10, I'm getting > > [javac]

[GitHub] ant-ivy pull request #67: IVY-1483 Invoke Ant through Ivy;

2018-02-27 Thread twogee
Github user twogee commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/67#discussion_r171053071 --- Diff: ivy.xml --- @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ + --- End diff -- Good catch, thanks. BTW, run this

Re: Ivy release this month?

2018-02-27 Thread Gintautas Grigelionis
2018-02-19 7:35 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig : > On 2018-02-18, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > > > 2018-02-18 20:30 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig : > > >> On 2018-02-18, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > > >>>- https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/63 (has to do

Ivy release instructions

2018-02-27 Thread Jaikiran Pai
In order to move towards a release soon, I decided to come up with an initial set of instructions that we might have to follow to generate the release. Most of the instructions have been borrowed from Ant's release process. Furthermore, the instructions are based on my checking out the release

Re: Ivy release this month?

2018-02-27 Thread Jaikiran Pai
- https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/67 (a one-liner; anybody sees some side effects?) I don't understand the issue. Is this a documented way of using Ivy or why would anybody expect it to be possible to invoke Ant via the Ivy jar? Somebody was interested enough to open a JIRA

Re: ant-ivy git commit: initial WIP version of release instructions to follow for releasing Ivy

2018-02-27 Thread Jaikiran Pai
No I hadn’t :) Will check it out tonight. -Jaikiran On Tuesday, February 27, 2018, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: > Have you seen doc/dev/makerelease.html ? > But updating (and maybe automating) is a good idea. ;) > > Jan > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > Von:

AW: ant-ivy git commit: initial WIP version of release instructions to follow for releasing Ivy

2018-02-27 Thread jhm
Have you seen doc/dev/makerelease.html ? But updating (and maybe automating) is a good idea. ;) Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: jaiki...@apache.org [mailto:jaiki...@apache.org] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Februar 2018 13:59 > An: notificati...@ant.apache.org > Betreff: ant-ivy git

Re: Ant 1.9.10 and Ivy

2018-02-27 Thread Jaikiran Pai
I'll grep through the sources and revert all changes to clone signatures unless anybody else beats me to it. Done https://github.com/apache/ant/commit/2e788849136bfd75e88ce0d959810f1191d43a33 -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe,

[GitHub] ant-ivy issue #63: IVY-1486 respect exclude regardless of order

2018-02-27 Thread twogee
Github user twogee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/63 A new version using `Deque` and providing a backwards compatible method. Any concurrency concerns? --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

AW: committer += gintas

2018-02-27 Thread jhm
It seems that having the site in git is possible [1]: - have your site in a git repo - open a INFRA Jira-Ticket - branch "asf-site" will be published We have 7 svn repos [2], most inactive (migrated to git), 1 active and 1 not used for a longer time: - antlibs, inactive repo, last change 2015,

Re: Ivy release this month?

2018-02-27 Thread Gintautas Grigelionis
The ugly thing 2018-02-27 22:40 GMT+01:00 Gintautas Grigelionis : > 2018-02-18 20:30 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig : > >> [Personally I prefer discussion by email over discussion in github >> issues.] >> > > The beauty is that GitHub comments are echoed in

Re: Ivy release this month?

2018-02-27 Thread Gintautas Grigelionis
2018-02-18 20:30 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig : > [Personally I prefer discussion by email over discussion in github > issues.] > The beauty is that GitHub comments are echoed in mailing list, and, in case of PR mentioning JIRA issues, in JIRA as well. Gintas