JDK 11 Early Access build 8 available

Hi Stefan, **JDK 11 EA build 8, *under both the GPL and Oracle EA licenses, is now available at **http://jdk.java.net/11**. ** * * Newly approved Schedule, status & features o http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/11/ * Release Notes: o http://jdk.java.net/11/release-notes *

[GitHub] ant-ivy issue #69: 2.4.x

Github user twogee commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/69 @supertick FYI, Ivy 2.5.0 RC is on the way, @nlalevee has kindly taken the role of release manager. Your latest commits are not merged to master, though. If you are interested in using 2.5.0, please

[GitHub] ant-ivy issue #69: 2.4.x

Github user sutchark commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/69 How should we let you know? Here? I am interested in using 2.5.0. --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Mass changes to various projects under Ant umbrella - should we be doing it?

Hi Martin, the issue is somewhat misleading. JUnit tests must be runner-agnostic, it should make no difference whether it's Ant-JUnit* or Surefire. However, it is my experience that Surefire needs basedir property to find things where Ant-JUnit* finds them. Once upon a time, Surefire lacked the

Re: Mass changes to various projects under Ant umbrella - should we be doing it?

On 2018-04-11, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > 2018-04-11 6:25 GMT+00:00 Jaikiran Pai :´ >> On 10/04/18 12:27 AM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: >>> I wrote earlier that I was about to review the unit tests. >>> I was particularly unhappy about the root-property hack for

Re: Junit Task warning about multiple versions of Ant

On 2018-04-12, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > The Junit task is printing a warning if it finds multiple versions of > Ant in the classpath of the unit tests. It seems it doesn’t do > correctly the job if the ant runtime is explicitly removed from the > classpath. Quite possible. > Here the function

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.5.0-rc1 Release

> Le 12 avr. 2018 à 18:29, Nicolas Lalevée a écrit > : > > I have built a release candidate for Ivy 2.5.0-rc1. > > The git tag of this release is: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ant-ivy.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.5.0-rc1 > >

Re: Mass changes to various projects under Ant umbrella - should we be doing it?

2018-04-12 15:18 GMT+00:00 Stefan Bodewig : > On 2018-04-12, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > > > 2018-04-12 14:39 GMT+00:00 Stefan Bodewig : > > >> On 2018-04-11, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > > >>> XMLCatalogTest is an example of unit tests complicated by

Re: Junit Task warning about multiple versions of Ant

> Le 12 avr. 2018 à 16:57, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > > On 2018-04-12, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > >> The Junit task is printing a warning if it finds multiple versions of >> Ant in the classpath of the unit tests. It seems it doesn’t do >> correctly the job if the ant

Re: Mass changes to various projects under Ant umbrella - should we be doing it?

On 2018-04-12, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > 2018-04-12 15:18 GMT+00:00 Stefan Bodewig : >> On 2018-04-12, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: >>> 2018-04-12 14:39 GMT+00:00 Stefan Bodewig : On 2018-04-11, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: >

Re: Junit Task warning about multiple versions of Ant

On 2018-04-12, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > As far as I can see, the classpath used by checkForkedPath is the > proper one. The function which manipulates the classpath to add the > Ant runtime [1] is called before. So I should start looking into the > AntClassLoader which is improperly finding the

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.5.0-rc1 Release

+1. Thank you Nicolas for running this release. Tested the following: - Downloaded the .tar.gz binary - Checked some random docs, that are part of the download. Looks fine. - Built some random internal projects using this downloaded version of Ivy, using Java 8. All went well. - Verified

Re: Mass changes to various projects under Ant umbrella - should we be doing it?

2018-04-12 14:39 GMT+00:00 Stefan Bodewig : > On 2018-04-11, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > > > XMLCatalogTest is an example of unit tests complicated by root property. > > Actually, the test even passes if you remove the line using the property > as long as your current

Re: Mass changes to various projects under Ant umbrella - should we be doing it?

On 2018-04-12, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > 2018-04-12 14:39 GMT+00:00 Stefan Bodewig : >> On 2018-04-11, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: >>> XMLCatalogTest is an example of unit tests complicated by root property. >> Actually, the test even passes if you remove the line