Re: [ANN] Ant 1.5.2 Released!

2003-03-06 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Congratulations everyone! I've updated the Jakarta site (listed Ant under elsewhere ;-), freshmeat and sent an announcement to Usenet. I'm back from my flu (this is what your kids are taking home from the kindergarten 8-) and readily packed with anti-histamin to resist the now blossoming birch

Re: Trouble using user properties in custom Ant task, help!!!

2003-03-06 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Barry Lulas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a custom task that extends the Java task because I want to be able to conditionalize on the exit code of the Java application. If you look into CVS HEAD, you'll see that java has gained quite a few new attributes, separting

Re: How do you communicate with an administrator of bugzilla?

2003-03-06 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to change the email address by which I am known to Bugzilla. This requires some extra bugzilla karma (more than I have). [EMAIL PROTECTED] is supposed to be the role-account for people with sufficient administrative privileges

Re: [SUBMIT] scp

2003-03-06 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi, I've committed the task more or less as-is, I pretty much only changed the package to be in ...optional.ssh as it seems we may get yet some more classes and it is easier to keep them in a single place. The net package might become too crowded, I thought. I haven't tested it extensively, but

Re: [patch] [bugfix] IntrospectionHelper.java

2003-03-06 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Sat, 01 Mar 2003, Neeme Praks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: storeElement() method silently returns, if the tag does not support the specified element. This is because storeElement can never be called without calling createElement before that from within Ant. It may be different from within

Re: [SUBMIT] scp

2003-03-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Joe Consumer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but I read on the jcraft site, that jsch requires 1.4 so I didn't bother. Two weeks ago or so I posted to the jsch list that I have successfully used jsch with JDK 1.2 (and 1.3) and bouncycastle's JCE implementation

Re: tests failing

2003-03-10 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i have been lax on running tests for a while; now I am seeing (on winXP, single CPU) Is this from CVS HEAD? Looks like the bug Nico's patch was supposed to fix (i.e.

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional/dotnet HelloWorld.wsdl example.cs example.il example2.il

2003-03-10 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 10 Mar 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional/dotnet/example2.il // Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 1998-2001. All rights reserved. I realize that this file may be a generated file, but I think this copyright notice is, uhm, problematic. Stefan

Re: ssh exec task...

2003-03-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi Robert, as you may have seen, our mailing list software strips all HTML parts from mails. I'm sure there has been some message in addition to the tarball 8-) I've committed modified versions of your code - in particular I've made the password part of user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/path optional to

Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

2003-03-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, this is me, I need to set up the build to exclude DotnetTest I've already taken care of it. Stefan

Re: ssh exec task...

2003-03-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Rob H. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is one problem with the sshexec task that someone should look into: I was not able to get the output from the remote command to show up in the log. It works if my machine (the one running Ant) is under heavy load, but doesn't

Re: 1.6 milestones ?

2003-03-13 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It'll have documentation after it is reviewed by more people and we know it's going to be stable. I don't like this approach at all. How are you expecting user feedback on an undocumented feature? Stefan

Re: 1.6 milestones ?

2003-03-13 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do we have any plan or idea on when we'll start distributing 1.6 milestone builds ? Ant has never released any milestone builds so far, so no, there is no plan yet AFAIK. If there was, you'd know it for sure 8-) Before we release

Re: JDK 1.1 support

2003-03-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Make Ant 1.6.x the last JDK 1.1 release. This would be clearly documented Fine with me. I'd like to keep 1.6 compatible to JDK 1.1, though. When we make 1.2 a requirement, we'd better start using collections and URLClassloader

Re: New External Task

2003-03-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
I've changed the page in CVS, the site should be updated sometime during the next few hours via cron. Stefan

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/filters EscapeUnicodeTest.java

2003-03-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 14 Mar 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: New filter escapeunicode that translates non-ASCII characters to \u1234 escapes. Maybe we want to rename that to native2ascii? IIUC correctly it does the same thing as the task or Sun's tool of that name (only that the filter will also recode the

Re: New related project

2003-03-18 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see a new project with it´s Ant tasks: www.AndroMDA.org . we usually don't go and search for projects to add, but wait for them to ask us 8-) Anyway, thanks for the pointer, I've added it - will appear on the site when cron kicks in.

Re: New J2ME Ant task

2003-03-18 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Steve Neal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've implemented this task recently to help with J2ME development Just out of curiosity, what has been wrong with one of the three existing sets of tasks? I've added the pointer, it should appear on the site within the next few hours.

CLAs for all committers

2003-03-18 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Dear co-committers, as you probably (hopefully) know, all of us need to sign the Contributor License Agreement that can be found here http://www.apache.org/foundation/ASF_Contributor_License_1_form.pdf. Now there is a very simple and quick check to see whether you have done so (or just think you

Re: java 1.1 on linux

2003-03-19 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is less clear to me is whether 1.5 branch should be the last 1.1 codebase or whether it should be 1.6. As you'll see shortly (when I cast my vote), we are pretty close to consensus here 8-) I'd like to settle this last aspect

Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.1 support

2003-03-19 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 06:13 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: -0 and +1 on doing it after 1.6. I think this is a majority vote, isn't it? Your -0 isn't a veto, in any case. I know, and I wouldn't want it to be one. Do you have some

Re: ssh exec task...

2003-03-20 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Dale Anson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've asked Atsuhiko (the jsch author) to make a minor change, he says it will be included in the next release, scheduled for tomorrow. Cool. I'll modify the task to capture the output correctly and make the maxwait attribute actually

Re: Perforce patch for 1.5.3

2003-03-20 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Matt Bishop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like someone to look at this patch for 1.5.3; Have you seen Antoine's comment on the bugrep that says your patch didn't change anything for him? To be honest, I don't see how it would help either as the exception is going to be

Re: java 1.1 on linux

2003-03-20 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, peter reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1.5.1 and 1.5: java.lang.ClassFormatError: Bad major version number I do not get this on an admittedly simple build file using Blackdown's 1.1.8. I.e. Ant 1.5.1 from the binary tar.gz version seems to work with JDK 1.1 for me.

Re: ssh exec task...

2003-03-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Dale Anson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One more question -- how is documentation handled? The same way as code, you send patches (diff -u). Docs are a bit more difficult if you want to send in complete new files as our mailing list configuration will not accept any HTML part

Re: Dynamic Configurator

2003-03-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Brett Wooldridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I run ant, I see that createDynamicElement() gets called twice for the junit element, and further that setDynamicAttribute() gets called twice for someattr. This certainly sounds like a bug. We don't call the attribute

Some library questions for the optional.jar stuff

2003-03-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Unless I'm mistaken, it seems that I'll have to compile a complete optional.jar for next Monday. 8-) OK, I've just now tried with an oldish fakeall.jar by Jon Skeet and the goodies Gump puts onto my box and ran into the following problems: [javac] DDCreatorHelper.java:60: package

AntClassLoader in 1.6

2003-03-24 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi, if we are going to go the 1.2+ route for Ant 1.6, can we change AntClassLoader in a way that Grant is going to work again (I vaguely recall something about a no-arg constructor being added or removed or something 8-). This would make the jelly-tags-html Gump build failure either go away or

Re: JBuilder Gel IDE Integration

2003-03-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Paul King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I didn't submit a bug on this 'cause I wasn't sure if this should normally come from the vendor themselves. Well, let's say we are not searching for the information, but add them when they get sent to us. Some vendors actually seem to

Re: JBuilder Gel IDE Integration

2003-03-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Paul King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: GEL IDE for Windows License: Freeware Isn't very specific and the site doesn't seem to give more details. I've downloaded the latest RC to see whether there are more license details but the setup.exe doesn't do any good on my Linux

Cygwin tester needed

2003-03-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi, please take a look at http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17721. I can reprodice this bug, but I'm afraid that the proposed patch will break Cygwin - as I have no idea how it handles absolute paths. The change would be in line 54 of the ant wrapper script (CVS HEAD), instead

Re: ssh exec task...

2003-03-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Dale Anson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached are updates for the SSHExec task and documentation as diffs. The updates fix the problem with output not always showing on the screen (or log). Thanks. I'll commit them after the release of jsch 0.1.3 final. While I was at

Re: Request for downloadable Ant Manual in pdf Thank you

2003-03-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am sure we could probably do a PDF build from the xdocs stuff now, I'm sure, too. if we somehow create docbook content via XSLT, velocity, whatever. Why docbook? You could create the XSL:FO directly, no? Please note that this

Re: Cygwin tester needed

2003-03-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Stefan Moebius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: warning: unportable BRE: `^/.*': using `^' as the first character of the basic regular expression is not portable; That's funny. The GNU man pages of expr(1) are a bit vague here (they talk about anchored expressions in context of

Re: [patch] [bugfix] IntrospectionHelper.java

2003-03-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Neeme Praks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefan Bodewig :: On Sat, 01 Mar 2003, Neeme Praks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: storeElement() method silently returns, if the tag does not support the specified element. This is because storeElement can never be called without calling

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

2003-03-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Adam Duffy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Myself and Leigh Ishikawa (Adding 'setName' support to the xmljunitresultformatter.java) have not received any response to our contributions. Can someone please advise? First advice would be to be more patient, four hours isn't that

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

2003-03-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That said (one more ;-), if Ant ever comes up with an easier way to integrate third party tasks Easier than taskdef resource=...classpath ...//taskdef? Almost impossible. Stefan

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

2003-03-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hu, not totally. Did I forget to put that smiley in? Since you now use twice the classpath, if needs to be outside and refid'd. No, you'll need to use the loaderref attribute. And what about the junit task? Easy in Ant

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

2003-03-27 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do we have a real-world candidate for antlib resource=.. classpathref=.. / ant-contrib's cpptasks, this includes custom tasks and types. Stefan

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/starteam TreeBasedTask.java

2003-03-27 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 27 Mar 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: log(checking label + stLabel.getName(), Project.MSG_DEBUG); - if (stLabel.getName().equals(this.label)) { + if (stLabel != null !stLabel.isDeleted() stLabel.getName().equals(this.label)) { given that the log line will have thrown a NPE if the

Merging fixes for 17646 and 17721 into 1.5.3?

2003-03-27 Thread Stefan Bodewig
The starteam patch looks innocent and the wrapper script change has been tested on Cygwin, Linux, MacOS X and Solaris and is know to work (and the corresponding bug report has been verified). But then again we've just released beta1 and I'm becoming more and more reluctant to changes post beta

Re: JBuilder Gel IDE Integration

2003-03-27 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Paul King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: P.S. Another suggestion: the external.html page has no internal navigation to get to the three sections: Tasks, Compiler Implementations and IDE and Editor Integration fixed in CVS - and soon at the site, thanks. (Sorry, I know I

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Copy.java

2003-03-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 28 Mar 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - public void setFailOnError(boolean failonerror) { - this.failonerror = failonerror; - } +public void setFailOnError(boolean failonerror) { +this.failonerror = failonerror; +} I have no idea what's

Re: Regression in CVS HEAD - probably related to embed proposal

2003-03-28 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 to the testcase. Done. I have disabled the import test because it fails but I want to re-enable and fix. The same strategy could be used here. OK, will disable the test shortly. I've also added the test to the 1.5 branch,

Re: Call for defaults.properties maintanance...

2003-03-31 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Christoph Wilhelms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To solve this topic I'd like to clearify here which of the listed elements should be listed in the defaults.properties Almost all of them are base classes that should not be listed or utterly, totally deprected and removed task -

junit, fork and CLASSPATH

2003-03-31 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi, I'm currently looking into Bug 14971. This bug points out an inconsistency in junit that has been there for ages and I'm a bit unsure on how to fix it. junit fork=true includeantruntime=yes will run the forked tests with a classpath containing ant.jar, optional.jar and junit.jar, nothing

Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

2003-04-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
This is bug 17807, I knew it would happen, I'll take care of it http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17807 Stefan

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional ANTLRTest.java

2003-04-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Note that test8 is now going to fail. test8 expects a BuildException to be thrown because the supergrammar file didn't exist. The real reason for the exception that has been thrown so far was that the outputdirectory didn't exist, I've fixed that. Now antlr will pront a warning error: file

Re: [Patch] for antlib proposal (sorry attachment was incomplete in previous email)

2003-04-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please submit quickly if you can to allow work on this proposal to resume. Quick enough? Stefan

Re: ssh exec task...

2003-04-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Dale Anson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The updates fix the problem with output not always showing on the screen (or log). I've committed a slightly modified version. The main difference (apart from formatting changes) are that timeout uses milliseconds as its value (like

Re: ssh exec task...

2003-04-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 01 Apr 2003, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The main difference (apart from formatting changes) are that timeout uses milliseconds as its value and defaults to 0 (like exec) Stefan

Re: ssh exec task...

2003-04-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 01 Apr 2003, Dale Anson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I take it you saw that jsch 0.1.3 was released this morning? Yep. Would you mind making one other minor change to the docs, it references jsch 0.1.2 as a requirement, but 0.1.3 is the minimum. Already changed in CVS. 8-) Stefan

Re: Patch JavaCC - KEEP_LINE_COLUMN, JJTree - OUTPUT_FILE and new tas kdef JJDoc

2003-04-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Jene Jasper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As mentioned yesterday, I have made some changes to the JavaCC and JJTree taskdefs and added a new taskdef for JJDoc. I have included the patch.txt for the changes. But what is the best way to deliver the new files JJDoc.java and

Re: Patch JavaCC - KEEP_LINE_COLUMN, JJTree - OUTPUT_FILE and new tas kdef JJDoc

2003-04-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Jene Jasper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does it make a difference if I make the patch on my latest revision or the snapshot of April 1st? It might be easier to do if you diffed against CVS HEAD, but ... I don't think it will involve the same lines of code. in this case,

Re: Patch JavaCC - KEEP_LINE_COLUMN, JJTree - OUTPUT_FILE and new tas kdef JJDoc

2003-04-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Jene Jasper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thus I will try to check in a patch for JavaCC 2.1/3.0 changes against the latest snapshot around Monday. CVS HEAD hasn't changed for quite some time, shouldn't be a problem. Stefan

Re: Using files in classpath in task file=

2003-04-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 02 Apr 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem is that AFAIK the xslt task needs a file, not an URL, and hence not a jar resource. Errm, where does it need the file? All tasks that resolve files IIUC call public File resolveFile(File file, String filename)

Re: Using files in classpath in task file=

2003-04-03 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 02 Apr 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I had it in jars I could ship it automatically with the jar that has the task that generated index.xml, so I can easily do something like: xslt in=index.xml out=index.html style=resource:/a/style.xsl/ I see.

Need JProbe testers

2003-04-03 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi, I've modified the JProbe tasks in a way that they now should autodetect and even work with JProbe 4.x. As I don't run any version of JProbe, I'd like to have people who currently run the JProbe tasks successfully (with older version of JProbe) to either bootstrap the CVS HEAD version of Ant

defaultexcludes in MatchingTask

2003-04-03 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Can anybody imagine/remember why MatchingTask#setDefaultExcludes does not set the corresponding value on the implicit fileset but defers that to getDirectoryScanner()? Stefan

Re: jdepend error

2003-04-03 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The version of jdepend I have hanging around for building Ant is not compatible with the recent changes Any chance to find out which version that is? I'll throw in a little reflection around this (the manual still claims support for

Re: jdepend error

2003-04-03 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The version of jdepend I have hanging around for building Ant is not compatible with the recent changes Does it at least have the PackageFilter class? Stefan

Re: jdepend error

2003-04-03 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 12:38 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The version of jdepend I have hanging around for building Ant is not compatible with the recent changes Any chance

Re: cvs commit: ant/xdocs/stylesheets templates.vm

2003-04-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 4 Apr 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: More CSS - less tables No question, it looks - umh - ugly on Netscape 4, don't know how much of a concern that has to be for us, though[1]. It works (the menu comes at the top, the content below) for links and lynx (text-only browsers that are used by

Re: Fwd: [Xdoclet-user] multiple jsptaglib nested tag in webdoclet

2003-04-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any ideas on the differences between using taskdef under project or under a target? Several, and they vary with the Ant version in use. With Ant 1.5.x, the main difference is that taskdefs defined at the project level will get

Re: updated sql documentation....

2003-04-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Rob H. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached is the updated sql documentation that I promised. Didn't make it to the list, sorry. Stefan

Where are we WRT the JDK decision?

2003-04-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
When I fixed the JDepend task, I made it depend on JDK 1.2 - which is fine as JDepend has the same dependency. I'll shortly commit the JUnit Report patches and those contain workarounds for the famous StringBuffer#toString memory leak[1] in JDK 1.4.1. Unfortunately the workaround is to use

Re: updated sql documentation....

2003-04-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Rob H. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about now? Got it. Stefan

Re: sql triggers, stored procedures, packages, format preserved

2003-04-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Rob H. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: one line, pretty self explanatory self explaining? Yes. I'm just not sure whether we want to do that unconditionally. Stefan

Re: Patch JavaCC - KEEP_LINE_COLUMN, JJTree - OUTPUT_FILE and new tas kdef JJDoc

2003-04-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Jene Jasper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would it be useful if I add an updated patch.txt to bug 18602 for JavaCC.java and JJTree.java after the changes are available in a nightly build ?? Maybe, but I don't think that merging them will be a big deal anyway. Stefan

Re: cvs commit: ant/xdocs/stylesheets templates.vm

2003-04-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
BTW, it looks nice in Safari as well, which probably makes up a considerable part of the Unknowns in http://www.apache.org/~vgritsenko/stats/daily.html#User+Agents+Stats Stefan

Re: [RESULT] Ant 1.6 will require JDK 1.2

2003-04-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's funny that Stefan, who only voted +0, is the first to make a change that requires JDK 1.2 :-) I couldn't find a workaround, that's all (yes, I've seen that smiley). Having said that, I could have left all toStrings as they were

Re: Using files in classpath in task file=

2003-04-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 04 Apr 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I mean is not to change the passing of a File object. I mean that we can *wrap* an URL in a File. So we pass a File, and use an URL, getting a Virtual File System. How so - put the URI into the name and abuse File as a

Re: Using files in classpath in task file=

2003-04-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 04 Apr 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sure. Look at the JDK 1.4 version, Ahh, far to modern for Ant. Because a URI can be navigated, and it's possible to make a File from a URI. Not always. org.apache.tools.vfs.File extends java.io.File But this version

Re: Using files in classpath in task file=

2003-04-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like for ANT to do this for me, transparently. property name=fileurl locationURL=${myfile}/ or somethig like that. Sure, should be trivial using FileUtils#toURI together with setLocationURL(File), I'm just

Re: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations

2003-04-08 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Ignacio J. Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió en el mensaje Class.forName will use the system classloader and not the nice little IMHO This contradicts my experience of CLs, i think some places inside tomcat used Class.forName also

Re: New external resource found

2003-04-08 Thread Stefan Bodewig
committed, thanks Stefan

Re: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release

2003-04-08 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am about to build Ant 1.5.3. Yes, yes, yes. Sigh with relief. 8-) +1 Stefan

Re: Making URIs from locations

2003-04-08 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Note the change to resource (from resources) to be consistent with taskdef / available. resources has been a typo, thanks. I assume the url attribute's signature would be setUrl(URL url). Yes. Stefan

Re: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release

2003-04-08 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm having trouble getting the JSPC test to work - any ideas? Did they change at all? IIRC jspc is still kind of broken but works a lot better than in 1.5.1. Stefan

Re: 1.5.3 Release

2003-04-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The 1.5.3 release is up on the site. I haven't had time to send the announcements out yet. Which may be good so that the mirrors have time to catch up. Freshmeat announcement is pending approval, next I'll do will be Usenet and the

Re: having datatypes load classes

2003-04-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 08 Apr 2003, Marc Portier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but since that pattern is to be seen more around ant iteself, I was hoping for some reuse here One would think so, but the truth is that you'll find copy-paste reuse in this area instead of delegation or something. Patches for a

Re: [PATCH] add regular expressions to ContainsSelector.java

2003-04-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was thinking that the filters were more geared to changing text, not just identifiying a file has a specific content. You are absolutely correct. What I tried to say in my clumsy way: We have to tasks that perform replacements, replace and

Re: having datatypes load classes

2003-04-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Marc Portier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: seems to me however the current LoaderUtil more has somewhat of a jdk-version match-up function? It used to be used for that, yes. But this part of its functionality is no longer needed in Ant 1.6 as we've dropped JDK 1.1

Re: [Patch] es to be submitted

2003-04-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are several bug reports where I have prepared code, and documentation and testcases , and I would like them to be submitted before the code patches are obsolete : There are certain constants in life, one is there will

Re: [Patch] es to be submitted

2003-04-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18849 Adds a new skip attribute to HeadFilter and TailFilter. We (or at least I) have some informal segmentation in Ant's code base. Bruce is the selector guy, Magesh is the filter guy

[VOTE] Antoine Levy-Lambert as committer

2003-04-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all, Antoine has continuously been sending in patches since months now, he's played an important role in the zip refactoring and is answering more question on the user list than most of us here. Furthermore Antoine has access to a perforce installation, so he's able to test and fix those

Re: cvs commit: ant/xdocs contributors.xml

2003-04-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 14 Apr 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Add myself to the list as a test of write access welcome! Further commit mails should go through without delay (this one was waiting in the moderation queue). Stefan

Re: FileUtils.createTempFile() - should we delete on exit?

2003-04-15 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Jesse Stockall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Should the fix be applied to each task that creates temp files, or should it be put in FileUtils.createTempFile(). The later (and I agree with Conor on the optional additional argument). Stefan

Test failures (Gump is coming to tell us anyway ...)

2003-04-15 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Like for Jesse, testTailSkip and testTailLinesSkip fail on Linux for me, I bet it is a line ending problem. As the nightly Gump build is performed on Linux as well, we are going to get nagged. In addition, testScriptFilter fails. It seems as if the new filter was using the old IBM BSF package

Re: cvs commit: ant/xdocs contributors.xml

2003-04-15 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 15 Apr 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Add myself to contributors list Welcome! again, future commit mails should go by without further delay. Stefan

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional/vss vss.xml

2003-04-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, Jesse Stockall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's fixed now. Yep, compiles again, thanks. Stefan

Re: junit.jar in Ant 1.5.3 distro?!?!?

2003-04-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why is Ant 1.5.3 shipping with junit.jar in ANT_HOME/lib??? It is? Which download? Without shipping the license of JUnit and all that, we can't do it. Stefan

Re: junit.jar in Ant 1.5.3 distro?!?!?

2003-04-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll rebuild the distribution tonight. One thing that you'll need to consider is that people may download the old distribution from a mirror and try to check it with the signature for the new distribution from www.apache.org. You

Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

2003-04-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 16 Apr 2003, Diane Holt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [junit] Testcase: testCheckoutCommandLine(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.vss.MSVSSTest): FAILED [junit] extra args [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: extra args [junit] at

Re: [VOTE] propertycopy

2003-04-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Just chiming in to clarify parts of the ant-contrib and copyright assignment stuff. As for the vote itself: I've never used that task and have always felt that not using it is simpler than using it. But then again, it's just me. I won't veto it's adoption, but would really prefer to not put

Re: [VOTE] propertycopy

2003-04-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The initial version was introduced by SF-user carnold (Curt Arnold) later modifications by SF-user bodewig (Stefan Bodewig). But Curt hasn't been the one who's written it, he just committed it in that location after some CVS reshuffling

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types ZipFileSet.java defaults.properties

2003-04-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Sat, 19 Apr 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have coded the calls to the getters of ZipFileSet similarly to the getters of FileSet or AbstractFileSet in Zip.java. They are the way they look right now because FileSet is much older than ProjectComponent and thus didn't

Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

2003-04-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Sat, 19 Apr 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * In the code of the War.java task, the lib attribute is defined as a ZipFileSet. In the documentation, the same lib attribute is defined as a FileSet. Should we fix the code or the documentation of the War task ? Which

Re: antlib

2003-04-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote, On 22/04/2003 12.40: On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Versioning, Has to be part of antlib anyway. And that is why I suggested this. Why reimplement something

Re: antlib

2003-04-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree with Stefan. Cool. Now if only I could find time to respond to Antoine's original mail. 8-) Will try very hard tomorrow. Regarding AntLib itself, XML descriptor or not, I'm more interested in being able to partition

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >