Re: 1.6 release?

2018-08-25 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 24.08.2018 um 23:41 schrieb Nick Kew: On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:16:54 -0400 Eric Covener wrote: Starting a new thread as potential RM's may be filtering bugzilla emails. There are a lot of reports of PR62644 from solaris users of httpd, can anyone RM? You've spurred me into reviewing

Re: svn commit: r1817889 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.7.x: ./ test/testipsub.c test/testlock.c

2018-08-25 Thread Rainer Jung
Should we backport this to 1.6.x? At least it would apply cleanly. Am 12.12.2017 um 09:07 schrieb jor...@apache.org: Author: jorton Date: Tue Dec 12 08:07:33 2017 New Revision: 1817889 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1817889=rev Log: Merge r1808910, r1813330 from trunk: *

Re: 1.6 release?

2018-08-25 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 24.08.2018 um 23:41 schrieb Nick Kew: On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:16:54 -0400 Eric Covener wrote: Starting a new thread as potential RM's may be filtering bugzilla emails. There are a lot of reports of PR62644 from solaris users of httpd, can anyone RM? You've spurred me into reviewing

Re: svn commit: r1834495 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.7.x: ./ build/ build/buildcheck.sh build/gen-build.py buildconf

2018-08-25 Thread Rainer Jung
Shouldn't this be backported to 1.6.x? Am 27.06.2018 um 13:49 schrieb jor...@apache.org: Author: jorton Date: Wed Jun 27 11:49:33 2018 New Revision: 1834495 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1834495=rev Log: Merge r1834494 from trunk: * build/buildcheck.sh, buildconf: Detect and run under

Re: svn commit: r1836519 - /apr/apr/trunk/strings/apr_strings.c

2018-08-25 Thread Rainer Jung
Should this be changed or reverted? The discussion seems to have stalled. And what about backport for 1.7.x and 1.6.x? Regards, Rainer Am 24.07.2018 um 17:42 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:53 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: I'm concerned that you've made a specific assumption

Backporting reslist changes?

2018-08-25 Thread Rainer Jung
I dont't remember the outcome of the discussions, but are any of the following three reslist changes reasonable for 1.6 backport? r1834030 | ylavic | 2018-06-21 19:06:34 +0200 (Thu, 21 Jun 2018) | 6 lines apr_reslist:

Re: svn commit: r1836519 - /apr/apr/trunk/strings/apr_strings.c

2018-08-25 Thread Nick Kew
> On 25 Aug 2018, at 14:55, Rainer Jung wrote: > > Should this be changed or reverted? The discussion seems to have stalled. Damn, did something half-baked get committed? > And what about backport for 1.7.x and 1.6.x? IMHO not for 1.6: keep changes really minimal. 1.7 would make sense. --

Re: 1.6 release?

2018-08-25 Thread Nick Kew
> On 25 Aug 2018, at 14:14, Rainer Jung wrote: > > > There's a list of changes done by Ivan Zhakov starting with 1785072 in early > 2017 to improve Win32 file I/O performance. Maybe Ivan can tell, whether they > can and should be backported to 1.7 (and 1.6?). My thought would be 1.7

Re: svn commit: r1817889 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.7.x: ./ test/testipsub.c test/testlock.c

2018-08-25 Thread Nick Kew
> On 25 Aug 2018, at 14:05, Rainer Jung wrote: > > Should we backport this to 1.6.x? At least it would apply cleanly. > > Am 12.12.2017 um 09:07 schrieb jor...@apache.org: >> Author: jorton >> Date: Tue Dec 12 08:07:33 2017 >> New Revision: 1817889 I'm fine either way. In the unlikely event

Re: Backporting reslist changes?

2018-08-25 Thread Nick Kew
> On 25 Aug 2018, at 15:03, Rainer Jung wrote: > > I dont't remember the outcome of the discussions, but are any of the > following three reslist changes reasonable for 1.6 backport? IMHO No. If it ain't broke, don't fix it in 1.6. Changes that call for non-trivial or production testing

Re: svn commit: r1839047 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.7.x: ./ misc/win32/start.c

2018-08-25 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 3:28 PM wrote: > > --- apr/apr/branches/1.7.x/misc/win32/start.c (original) > +++ apr/apr/branches/1.7.x/misc/win32/start.c Sat Aug 25 13:28:30 2018 > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ int APR_DECLARE_DATA apr_app_init_comple > * _CRT_BLOCK to trick the system into trusting our store. >

Re: svn commit: r1839047 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.7.x: ./ misc/win32/start.c

2018-08-25 Thread Christophe JAILLET
Le 25/08/2018 à 20:18, Yann Ylavic a écrit : On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 3:28 PM wrote: --- apr/apr/branches/1.7.x/misc/win32/start.c (original) +++ apr/apr/branches/1.7.x/misc/win32/start.c Sat Aug 25 13:28:30 2018 @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ int APR_DECLARE_DATA apr_app_init_comple * _CRT_BLOCK to