Re: cvs commit: apr apr_common.m4 hints.m4

2000-11-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
(eg: MM?). I don't think the above will work, at least it won't in the original way we were using it. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Casanova will have many weapons

hints.m4

2001-01-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
the settings in hints by forcing CFLAGS, LIBS, etc... on the command line. I still think we need that somehow. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Casanova will have many weapons

Re: cvs commit: apr hints.m4 configure.in

2001-01-13 Thread Jim Jagielski
| -- -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Casanova will have many weapons; To beat him you

Re: cvs commit: apr hints.m4 configure.in

2001-01-13 Thread Jim Jagielski
directly... With this patch it now builds again and can be seen in action running on BeOS R5 at Then I vote we keep it with the patch folded in then. Looks like it works on all required systems. -- === Jim Jagielski

Re: threads on FreeBSD - disable?

2001-02-16 Thread Jim Jagielski
this is the kind of thing hints.m4 was designed for. Yep, exactly. PS: I think we should tank threaded support for *all* of 4.2. It's all pretty bogus. Maybe 4.3 will be better. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Mixing Apache and Mozilla

2001-02-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
not it at all. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Casanova will have many weapons; To beat him you will have to have more than forks and flatulence.

Re: Mixing Apache and Mozilla

2001-02-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
close to the platforms that 1.3 was running on, and porting it to them would have been nigh impossible. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Casanova will have many weapons

Re: Mixing Apache and Mozilla

2001-02-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
ported, but back then, it was maybe 4 or 5 platforms. It was *way* less than what we were running. It was a serious consideration. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com

problems using symlinks for apr and apr-utils

2001-02-25 Thread Jim Jagielski
a few other people. Just a FYI. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Casanova will have many weapons; To beat him you will have to have more than forks

Re: cvs commit: apr configure.in

2001-02-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
... -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

Re: cvs commit: apr configure.in

2001-02-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

Re: cvs commit: apr configure.in

2001-02-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
like this :) PS: I see some weird things where we set things to 'yes' or 'no' which we may be able to standardize -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot

Re: cvs commit: apr configure.in

2001-02-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
, forces us into some standardization, which can't be bad. It should be pretty easy to implement. Could also do it for APR_FLAG_FUNCS. Let me know... if there's a desire, I'll do it. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL

APR_FLAG_HEADERS

2001-02-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
I've got a real cool idea about how to make everyone happy... Heading out right now, but will commit something later today :) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell

more on APR_FLAGS_* stuff

2001-02-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
Next will be to migrate to APR_FLAGS_FUNCS... will do a bit later. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

Re: APR_FLAG_HEADERS

2001-02-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
. I see what the trouble is... Coming up. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

Re: cvs commit: apr configure.in

2001-02-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

Re: cvs commit: apr/build apr_common.m4

2001-02-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
between some commits... -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

APR_FLAG_HEADERS still mangled, I think...

2001-02-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
-- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

Re: cvs commit: apr configure.in

2001-02-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
...) done instead of: AC_CHECK_HEADERS($stuff) But it was a lng day ;) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

Re: APR_FLAG_HEADERS still mangled, I think...

2001-02-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
and the FreeBSDs are using, well, their own :) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

apr_private.h.in

2001-02-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
: -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

Re: apr_private.h.in

2001-02-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

Re: cvs commit: apr configure.in

2001-02-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
) from what I can see. Note I've just reset configure.in. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

Re: apr_private.h.in

2001-02-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

Re: apr_private.h.in

2001-02-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
Jim Jagielski wrote: Do a ./buildconf so that autoheader is called. You'll see that apr_private.h.in isn't being correctly built. Now this is weird... it builds fine under Linux, but not under FreeBSD. -- === Jim

Re: apr_private.h.in

2001-02-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

m4 and APR_FLAGS_HEADER

2001-02-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
Using GNUm4 under FreeBSD makes everything work... -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

Re: m4 and APR_FLAGS_HEADER

2001-02-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Jim Jagielski wrote: Using GNUm4 under FreeBSD makes everything work... That is not a restriction we want to add if at all possible. Well, at least now I can build... I'll restore configure.in to use APR_FLAG_HEADERS to see if we can

Re: FreeBSD and gnu m4

2001-02-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
]) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

patsubst

2001-02-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
What's patsubst ? I don't see it in any m4 docs? -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

Re: patsubst

2001-02-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
Greg Stein wrote: On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 02:44:50PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: What's patsubst ? I don't see it in any m4 docs? Info m4 - Text Handling - Patsubst Dunno if it has always been around, or whether it is relatively new. Considering the glacial pace of m4 development

Re: FreeBSD and gnu m4

2001-03-02 Thread Jim Jagielski
. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

Re: FreeBSD and gnu m4

2001-03-02 Thread Jim Jagielski
of autoconf doesn't imply that everything will automatically be portable :) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

APR_FLAG_FUNCS ?

2001-03-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
Would it make sense to migrate over to APR_FLAG_FUNCS? -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

Re: cvs commit: apr/build aplibtool.c

2001-03-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

Re: cvs commit: apr/build aplibtool.c

2001-03-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

Re: KR 6.1.4 [2nd ed] Still Applicable?

2001-04-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
has a _yes_ or something definative, please speak up. Bill -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody.

Re: Memory Renaming (try 2)

2001-05-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
this particular check isn't a bad idea then. SVID states that malloc(0) must return NULL. ANSI doesn't... :) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ Hell is hot, that's never

Re: The finfo-name of root?

2001-05-16 Thread Jim Jagielski
that? I would think that '/ntmount/foo/' should, as far as the code is concerned, think the filename is foo and that it's a directory. If it's not a directory, it should error out. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED

Accept mutex

2001-06-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
? -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ It's *good* to be the King.

Re: Accept mutex

2001-06-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
? Would this mean that the Apache code would need to try multiple kinds of locks before it necessarily found one that worked? -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com

Re: Apache modules

2001-06-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
At 3:16 PM +0100 6/22/01, Paul Hooper wrote: Fellow Apache Gurus Is mod_ssl shipped as standard with Apache_1.3.12 If not do you know where I can get a copy?? check out www.modssl.org and www.openssl.org -- === Jim

Re: Accept mutex

2001-06-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ It's *good* to be the King.

Re: Accept mutex

2001-06-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
Yes, in 1.3.x is pretty trivial. It's a tiny bit more complex in 2.0, but not much. I agree that it makes sense for both versions. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com

Re: Accept mutex

2001-06-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
:) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ It's *good* to be the King.

Re: warnings with APR_USE_PROC_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE

2001-07-02 Thread Jim Jagielski
than I have... --Cliff -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ It's *good* to be the King.

Re: freelists: a slightly different approach

2001-09-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
Cliff Woolley wrote: Will I get lynched if I further suggest putting this thing in the scoreboard? No... seems the logical place IMO -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com

Re: Is libtool portable across platforms?

2001-10-18 Thread Jim Jagielski
Linux) Pier -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve

Re: [PROPOSAL] apr_shm_t, a new shared memory API to replace old

2002-01-07 Thread Jim Jagielski
Ian Holsman wrote: do you think we should TAG .30 before you introduce this? +1 ! -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty

Re: [PATCH] Add --enable-pool-debug to configure

2002-01-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
Sander Striker wrote: Hi, This is kind of a convenience patch. It allows you to specify the type of pools debugging you want at configure time. +1 -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http

APR_USE_SHMEM_SHMGET_ANON

2002-01-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
?? -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither

Re: APR_USE_SHMEM_SHMGET_ANON

2002-01-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
At 4:27 PM -0500 1/14/02, Jim Jagielski wrote: o (more controversial) removing the setting of the user and group ID of the shared mem segment. There was discussion about this but this was never done. I may actually wrap this in a preprocessor container. Hold on a tic... seems

Re: [PATCH] Add --enable-pool-debug to configure

2002-01-15 Thread Jim Jagielski
. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither

RE: configure option to specify mmap/shm

2002-02-07 Thread Jim Jagielski
-- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson

Latest CVS on Solaris 8 - configure's cache-file problems

2002-03-06 Thread Jim Jagielski
) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson

Re: Latest CVS on Solaris 8 - configure's cache-file problems

2002-03-06 Thread Jim Jagielski
Yep... Looks like it's no problem with 2.52. Anyone have hearburn if I adjust buildcheck.sh to make 2.52 the new requirement? Jim Jagielski wrote: I'll adjust PATH and see if that's the dependency... It's not libtool dependent AFAIK (I tried 1.4.2 and 1.3.5). Justin Erenkrantz wrote

Re: Latest CVS on Solaris 8 - configure's cache-file problems

2002-03-06 Thread Jim Jagielski
). -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson

autoconf 2.13/2.52 and Solaris

2002-03-06 Thread Jim Jagielski
is what's causing the problem. I'll see how we pass the location around. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order

Re: cvs commit: apr/build apr_common.m4

2002-03-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
! - Life of Brian | -- -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little

Re: cvs commit: apr/build apr_common.m4

2002-03-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
I'm following up... Greg Stein wrote: On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 12:50:43PM +1000, Brian Havard wrote: On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 20:41:12 -0500 (EST), Jim Jagielski wrote: Weird... I'm guessing you don't have problems with the other usages of ${}... $3 should be special enough not to require

APR_LOCK_DEFAULT ordering

2002-03-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
Are people happy with the priority order of the accept mutex? Right now it's flock - sysvsem - fcntl - pthread. I think it should be pthread - sysvsem - fcntl - flock, which is what 1.3 has... -- === Jim Jagielski

Re: APR_LOCK_DEFAULT ordering

2002-03-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
Jeff Trawick wrote: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Are people happy with the priority order of the accept mutex? Right now it's flock - sysvsem - fcntl - pthread. I think it should be pthread - sysvsem - fcntl - flock, which is what 1.3 has... I realize everybody has

Re: APR_LOCK_DEFAULT ordering

2002-03-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
= apr_proc_mutex_unix_sysv_methods; If that were #if apr_HAVE_flock_serialize instead of apr_USE_flock_serialize then I'd believe you. By gum, you're right. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com

1.3.24 tarballs...

2002-03-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
... are available at /www/httpd.apache.org/dev/dist (sorry if you've already rec'd this notice) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little

Re: cvs commit: apr configure.in

2002-03-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
. ++1 -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson

Re: cvs commit: apr/dso/unix dso.c

2002-03-25 Thread Jim Jagielski
occur :( -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson

Re: cvs commit: apr/dso/unix dso.c

2002-03-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
Pier Fumagalli wrote: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: (IME, pthread-based locks tend to be the fastest, but not many platforms support that.) IME - In My Experience ??? :) how about semaphores against file locks? Sems are faster there too

Re: cvs commit: apr/dso/unix dso.c

2002-03-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
APR_HAS_PROC_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE0 ./srclib/apr/include/apr.h:#define APR_HAS_RWLOCK_SERIALIZE 0 -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty

Re: cvs commit: apr/build apr_hints.m4

2002-04-01 Thread Jim Jagielski
serialization by default (thanks, Jeff!) and clean up the STATUS file. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order

Re: Additional inter-process locking mechanism...

2002-04-01 Thread Jim Jagielski
-- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson

Re: cvs commit: apr/locks/unix crossproc.c locks.c proc_mutex.c

2002-04-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
implement it correctly, then that's what the hell APR_DECISION_OVERRIDE and hints is for. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty

Re: [VOTE] final removal of apr_lock.h

2002-04-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
-- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson

Darwin linking and loading

2002-04-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
dyld is fun reading as well). Also, if one is interested, check out sample (or Sample.app if so included) and sc_usage as well, for fun Darwin tools. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http

APR's configure

2002-04-15 Thread Jim Jagielski
. Any idea why we worry about this (finding echo's that don't interpret backslashes) in APR and nowhere else... APR is the only one that sincludes the libtool.m4 file... -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Problem with child reaping on Tru64

2002-04-18 Thread Jim Jagielski
; return oact.sa_handler; -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell... married an alien... -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade

Re: Problem with child reaping on Tru64

2002-04-18 Thread Jim Jagielski
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just my 2cents; you'll do want you want. That did *not* come out right... :) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society

Re: Problem with child reaping on Tru64

2002-04-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
:) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson

Re: Volunteering to be RM, WAS: RE: Release 2.0.36 (fwd)

2002-04-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson

Re: Volunteering to be RM, WAS: RE: Release 2.0.36 (fwd)

2002-04-24 Thread Jim Jagielski
-- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson

Re: Volunteering to be RM, WAS: RE: Release 2.0.36 (fwd)

2002-04-24 Thread Jim Jagielski
, #function; \ x: MCOUNT(x) and the #function... -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both

Re: Volunteering to be RM, WAS: RE: Release 2.0.36 (fwd)

2002-04-24 Thread Jim Jagielski
with regards to warnings. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither

gcc3 and Solaris atomic: (Was: Re: Volunteering to be RM, WAS: RE: Release 2.0.36)

2002-04-24 Thread Jim Jagielski
). -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson

Re: Solaris binary compatability bug

2002-04-24 Thread Jim Jagielski
) where we do a strspn to see if we are dealing with dotted-quad notation? Makes sense... -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty

Re: atomics on solaris producing non-portable binaries

2002-04-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
Except that, at least to me, it looks like apr_atomic_sparc.s itself isn't totally portable among all Sparcs. Isn't 'cas' an 8+ opcode? So to use apr_atomic_sparc.s, at a minimum we need that. -- === Jim Jagielski

Atomics in general

2002-04-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson

Re: Darwin strangeness on apr_exports.h

2002-04-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
to old cpp, it correctly handles the file. The file itself is weird, but that's a different point :) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little

Re: Darwin strangeness on apr_exports.h

2002-04-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
smart-mode at configure time, however... it's also the default in gcc3 for Darwin as well. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty

offline for awhile

2002-04-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
I'll be traveling the next several days, and although not completely offline, might as well be... -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little

Re: cvs commit: apr/dso/unix dso.c

2002-05-02 Thread Jim Jagielski
= NSLinkModule(image, path, FALSE); +handle = NSLinkModule(image, path, FALSE); #endif NSDestroyObjectFileImage(image); } -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: can we require libtool 1.4 ?

2002-05-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
experience. Assuming that the actual packages themselves work individually, I've not seen any dependencies other than the 1.4.2 one for libtool. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com

Re: apr_time_t -- apr_time_usec_t

2002-06-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
the nastyness of 64bit mult/division when we (always) need second resolution is another. Sure would be nice if it was an exact power of 2 :) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com

Re: random number generator

2002-06-17 Thread Jim Jagielski
Ben Laurie wrote: I still say it should be runtime configurable. ++1 -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order

Re: [PATCH] Regarding semun definition in proc_mutex.h

2002-06-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
configure time? -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson

RE: [PATCH] Regarding semun definition in proc_mutex.h

2002-06-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
, with; typedef union ap_intptr_t { int i; int *p; } ap_intptr_t; and take ap_intptr_t or sizeof(ap_intptr_t) when we need an object that safely maps either and both. Bill -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: A common method for determining system utilization

2002-06-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
()?? -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson

Re: [PATCH] fixes for apr_vformatter and apr_snprintf

2002-07-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
, the string was too short and some of the printed characters were discarded. So if truncated, what is returned *must* be = the length passed in. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com

Re: [PATCH] fixes for apr_vformatter

2002-07-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither - T.Jefferson

Re: [PATCH] fixes for apr_vformatter and apr_snprintf

2002-07-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
for a bug in apr_psprintf... -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither

Re: [PATCH 2] example binary BUSEC patch for benchmarking only

2002-07-11 Thread Jim Jagielski
with a quick glance that 1048576 is really 2^20. It is :) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >