Re: 1.6.0 release candidates

Now also build with Openssl 1.1.0e. Running now on Apachelounge. Build with: --- httpd 2.4.26-dev nghttp2 1.21.1 apr 1.6.1-dev with IPv6 enabled apr-util 1.6.1-dev with Crypto OpenSSL enabled apr-iconv 1.2.1 openssl 1.1.0e zlib 1.2.11 pcre 8.40 with JIT, SUPPORT_UTF8 and

Re: 1.6.0 release candidates

Am 18.04.2017 um 00:16 schrieb Yann Ylavic: Thanks Rainer for the detailed report (as usual). On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: c) Failure to compile apr on Solaris 8 -- Using gcc 4.1.2 compiling

Re: 1.6.0 release candidates

Am 18.04.2017 um 00:16 schrieb Yann Ylavic: Thanks Rainer for the detailed report (as usual). On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: c) Failure to compile apr on Solaris 8 -- Using gcc 4.1.2 compiling

Re: 1.6.0 release candidates

Am 18.04.2017 um 16:25 schrieb Rainer Jung: Am 18.04.2017 um 00:16 schrieb Yann Ylavic: Thanks Rainer for the detailed report (as usual). On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: c) Failure to compile apr on Solaris 8

Re: 1.6.0 release candidates

On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 17:06 +0100, Nick Kew wrote: >And I need to do some more digging > around that bogus PGP key! OK, this follows a subject that's been raised @apache before:

Re: 1.6.0 release candidates

Am 18.04.2017 um 12:09 schrieb Nick Kew: On Mon, 2017-04-17 at 17:06 +0100, Nick Kew wrote: And I need to do some more digging around that bogus PGP key! OK, this follows a subject that's been raised @apache before:

Re: 1.6.0 release candidates

Build Win32 with current httpd-2.4.26-dev, used not nick's files but exported today 1.6.1-dev Used the IDE build (.dsw and dsp). Building fine. New warnings: locks\win32\proc_mutex.c(170): warning C4244: 'initializing': conversion from 'apr_interval_time_t' to 'DWORD', possible loss of

Re: 1.6.0 release candidates

Am 18.04.2017 um 00:16 schrieb Yann Ylavic: d) Hang during APR make check on Solaris 10 (testprocmutex) --- pthread_mutex_timedlock() hangs when the current thread already has locked the mutex. ... Assuming the Solaris code is similar

Re: 1.6.0 release candidates

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Am 18.04.2017 um 00:16 schrieb Yann Ylavic: >> >> All the above hopefuly fixes with r1791718 and r1791728, both >> backported to 1.6.x. > > Sorry to say that, but there's now another strange test result on Solaris 8. >