Hi all,
I'd like to be able to use the apr_atomic primitives for cross-process
work in shared memory, but as far as I can see, not every implementation
is guaranteed to work across processes (for example, the generic
implementation uses apr_thread_mutex*).
I'd be fine falling back to a
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 11:10 PM, wrote:
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Thu Jun 1 21:10:38 2017
> New Revision: 1797267
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1797267=rev
> Log:
> Partially revert 1738806 (r1733775, r1738791 from trunk), preserve
> apr_os_proc_mutex_get_ex|_put_ex,
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Greg and others... (Netware, Win32, OS2, BEOS), please have a look
> at the attached patch, which should apply to the 1.6.1 candidate.
Committed, review on Netware, OS2 and BEOS would still be appreciated,
either
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> From an API perspective, the single timeout argument looks consensual.
> So there may still be some bug(s) somewhere, which we would fix as
> always, but it would unlikely break existing applications since it's
> new
That works for me on Windows.
Thanks.
On 5/31/2017 3:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
Greg and others... (Netware, Win32, OS2, BEOS), please have a look
at the attached patch, which should apply to the 1.6.1 candidate.
It suggests several fixes are needed on 1.7.x branch as well, because
Hi Bill,
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 6:32 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> From an API perspective, the single timeout argument looks consensual.
>> So there may still be some bug(s) somewhere, which