Re: uuid generation on linux boxes

2003-11-06 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have a issue with a linux box not having enough entropy and hanging > on a call to apr_uuid_get (as it calls /dev/random) > > I was wondering why we don't just use /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid > and use that for our uuid? If you are building APR yourse

Re: confusion about largefile support

2005-05-31 Thread C. Michael Pilato
Erik Huelsmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 5/31/05, Ben Collins-Sussman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On May 31, 2005, at 11:49 AM, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote: > > > > > > Funny, KDE is using fsfs, and I would have expected them to run > > > into a >2GB revision file. > > > > > > > Well

Buffer overflow in apr_brigade_vprintf() ?

2009-04-24 Thread C. Michael Pilato
be arbitrary binary data? Other calls to it pass things like "str" and "strlen(str)", which would ignore the NULL byte in "str". [1] http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&viewType=browseAll&dsMessageId=1745697 -- C. Michael Pilato CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Buffer overflow in apr_brigade_vprintf() ?

2009-04-24 Thread C. Michael Pilato
C. Michael Pilato wrote: > [Please Cc: me in responses -- I think I still have APR commit privs, but > I'm not active here and not subscribed to the mailing lists.] > > In the past couple of weeks, I've seen two different reports of what appears > to be corrupt

Re: Subversion's Berkeley DB detection with APR trunk

2011-06-21 Thread C. Michael Pilato
-version parameter was dropped. In the absence of a solid reason, I think APR should be changed to support as much. -- C. Michael Pilato CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand

Re: Subversion's Berkeley DB detection with APR trunk

2011-06-21 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 06/21/2011 09:42 AM, Philip Martin wrote: > "C. Michael Pilato" writes: > >> I'd be interested in knowing why the --db-version parameter was >> dropped. In the absence of a solid reason, I think APR should be >> changed to support as much. > >