Same question again, is this an apr or svn behavior change?
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On 11.12.2015 11:32, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Stefan Fuhrmann [mailto:stef...@apache.org]
>>> Sent: donderdag 10
On 22.12.2015 22:09, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
Same question again, is this an apr or svn behavior change?
Sorry, I must have missed your initial reply then. APR's
implementation grew more capable over the last years.
A change in SVN made us aware that earlier APR releases
were less capable.
On 11.12.2015 11:32, Bert Huijben wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Fuhrmann [mailto:stef...@apache.org]
Sent: donderdag 10 december 2015 23:59
To: dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: [PATCH] APR hash documentation
Hi there,
since 1.4.6, the hash implementation allows for
mismatching
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Fuhrmann [mailto:stef...@apache.org]
> Sent: donderdag 10 december 2015 23:59
> To: dev@apr.apache.org
> Subject: [PATCH] APR hash documentation
>
> Hi there,
>
> since 1.4.6, the hash implementation allows for
> mismatching and custom hash functions