Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

[Nick Kew]

On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:22:32 -0500
William A Rowe Jr  wrote:

> Please cast your votes on the following release candidate
> found at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ (note release.sh
> is generating sha256+sha512, all in coreutils format.)
> 
> Release apr-1.6.5
>   [  ] +/-1

+1 (Debian).

It's possible but unlikely I'll get to test elsewhere
in the time available.  But it certainly won't be
platforms of real interest in this release.

Thanks for doing the RM job!

-- 
Nick Kew

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

[Dennis Clarke]

On 09/11/2018 05:48 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:33 PM Dennis Clarke  wrote:


testsock:  Line 376: Cannot test if connect completes
synchronously


This one really depends on the time taken by the system to connect
localhost non-blocking.
If it's immediate (that happens), the test is not relevant and this is
what the above is saying.
So this message may or not be printed on different runs.


testsockets :  SUCCESS
testsockopt :  Line 84: TCP isn't corkable


Is TCP_CORK or TCP_NOPUSH defined on Solaris (in "netinet/tcp.h")?


nope.

$ grep -E "TCP_CORK|TCP_NOPUSH" /usr/include/netinet/tcp.h


Same Solaris version for 1.6.x and 1.5.x tests?


yep.

Lemme dig around here a bit. Something is fishy about these results.

dc

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

[Yann Ylavic]

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:33 PM Dennis Clarke  wrote:
>
> testsock:  Line 376: Cannot test if connect completes
> synchronously

This one really depends on the time taken by the system to connect
localhost non-blocking.
If it's immediate (that happens), the test is not relevant and this is
what the above is saying.
So this message may or not be printed on different runs.

> testsockets :  SUCCESS
> testsockopt :  Line 84: TCP isn't corkable

Is TCP_CORK or TCP_NOPUSH defined on Solaris (in "netinet/tcp.h")?
Same Solaris version for 1.6.x and 1.5.x tests?

Regards,
Yann.

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

[Dennis Clarke]

On 09/11/2018 05:10 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:16 PM Dennis Clarke > wrote:
The way to answer this question is to rebuild apr 1.6.3 (perhaps 1.6.0) 
on this

specific machine to compare the results and ensure we haven't introduced
a regression.

Thanks for reviewing!

Bill


I knew you were going to say that :-\

Well 1.6.3 is the very same.

testsock:  SUCCESS
testsockets :  SUCCESS

whereas 1.5.1 says :

testsock:  Line 376: Cannot test if connect completes 
synchronously

testsockets :  SUCCESS
testsockopt :  Line 84: TCP isn't corkable

Yes 1.5.2 claims :

testsock:  SUCCESS
testsockets :  SUCCESS
testsockopt :  SUCCESS

I have data going back years here ... one sec while I make a coffee and
 figure out what is going on here.

Dennis

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

[William A Rowe Jr]

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:16 PM Dennis Clarke  wrote:

>
> I am not sure if we care about a few items below. On Solaris 10 SPARC it
> seems to work with a few minor notes.
>
>  TCP isn't corkable ??
>
>  testsock : Cannot test if connect completes synchronously ??


The way to answer this question is to rebuild apr 1.6.3 (perhaps 1.6.0) on
this
specific machine to compare the results and ensure we haven't introduced
a regression.

Thanks for reviewing!

Bill

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

[Yann Ylavic]

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:23 PM William A Rowe Jr  wrote:
>
> Release apr-1.6.5

+1, all good on Debian(s) 7/8/9/10.

Thanks for RMing Bill.

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

[Noel Butler]

On 11/09/2018 07:28, William A Rowe Jr wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:22 PM William A Rowe Jr  
> wrote: 
> 
>> Please cast your votes on the following release candidate 
>> found at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ (note release.sh 
>> is generating sha256+sha512, all in coreutils format.) 
>> 
>> Release apr-1.6.5
>> [+1] +/-1
> 
> Sorry for the delay; extra pre-testing on the Windows flavors that Steffen 
> may not have examined (and trusting his testing of dsp/dsw)... 
> 
> This is my +1 based on Fedora, Ubuntu, Ubuntu on Windows, 
> and Win32 64-bit CMake builds.

all good on slackware

-- 
Kind Regards, 

Noel Butler 

This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally 
privileged
information, therefore remains confidential and subject to copyright
protected under international law. You may not disseminate, discuss, or
reveal, any part, to anyone, without the authors express written
authority to do so. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
the sender then delete all copies of this message including attachments,
immediately. Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not
waived or lost by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message. Only
PDF [1] and ODF [2] documents accepted, please do not send proprietary
formatted documents 

 

Links:
--
[1] http://www.adobe.com/
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

[Gregg Smith]

On 9/11/2018 1:30 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:

On 9/10/2018 2:22 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:

Please cast your votes on the following release candidate
found at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ (note release.sh
is generating sha256+sha512, all in coreutils format.)

Release apr-1.6.5
   [  ] +/-1

This vote will conclude at 5pm EDT Thursday 9/13, for
announcement Friday in the event of a successful vote.


+1 Win x64 via makefile.win

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

[Dennis Clarke]

On 09/11/2018 03:30 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:

Le 10/09/2018 à 23:22, William A Rowe Jr a écrit :

Please cast your votes on the following release candidate
found at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ (note release.sh
is generating sha256+sha512, all in coreutils format.)

Release apr-1.6.5
  [  ] +/-1

This vote will conclude at 5pm EDT Thursday 9/13, for
announcement Friday in the event of a successful vote.


+1, Ubuntu 18.04, gcc 8.1.0

CJ



I am not sure if we care about a few items below. On Solaris 10 SPARC it 
seems to work with a few minor notes.


TCP isn't corkable ??

testsock : Cannot test if connect completes synchronously ??

Otherwise :


APR Lock Performance Test
==

apr_thread_mutex_t Tests
Initializing the apr_thread_mutex_t (UNNESTED)  OK
Starting 1 threadsOK
microseconds: 93813 usec
apr_thread_mutex_t Tests
Initializing the apr_thread_mutex_t (NESTED)OK
Starting 1 threadsOK
microseconds: 97361 usec
apr_thread_rwlock_t Tests
Initializing the apr_thread_rwlock_tOK
Starting 1 threadsOK
microseconds: 196671 usec
apr_thread_mutex_t Tests
Initializing the apr_thread_mutex_t (UNNESTED)  OK
Starting 2 threadsOK
microseconds: 224234 usec
apr_thread_mutex_t Tests
Initializing the apr_thread_mutex_t (NESTED)OK
Starting 2 threadsOK
microseconds: 299680 usec
apr_thread_rwlock_t Tests
Initializing the apr_thread_rwlock_tOK
Starting 2 threadsOK
microseconds: 8193188 usec
apr_thread_mutex_t Tests
Initializing the apr_thread_mutex_t (UNNESTED)  OK
Starting 3 threadsOK
microseconds: 369006 usec
apr_thread_mutex_t Tests
Initializing the apr_thread_mutex_t (NESTED)OK
Starting 3 threadsOK
microseconds: 473677 usec
apr_thread_rwlock_t Tests
Initializing the apr_thread_rwlock_tOK
Starting 3 threadsOK
microseconds: 12152923 usec
apr_thread_mutex_t Tests
Initializing the apr_thread_mutex_t (UNNESTED)  OK
Starting 4 threadsOK
microseconds: 617788 usec
apr_thread_mutex_t Tests
Initializing the apr_thread_mutex_t (NESTED)OK
Starting 4 threadsOK
microseconds: 668268 usec
apr_thread_rwlock_t Tests
Initializing the apr_thread_rwlock_tOK
Starting 4 threadsOK
microseconds: 15982171 usec
apr_thread_mutex_t Tests
Initializing the apr_thread_mutex_t (UNNESTED)  OK
Starting 5 threadsOK
microseconds: 700494 usec
apr_thread_mutex_t Tests
Initializing the apr_thread_mutex_t (NESTED)OK
Starting 5 threadsOK
microseconds: 822933 usec
apr_thread_rwlock_t Tests
Initializing the apr_thread_rwlock_tOK
Starting 5 threadsOK
microseconds: 20417000 usec
apr_thread_mutex_t Tests
Initializing the apr_thread_mutex_t (UNNESTED)  OK
Starting 6 threadsOK
microseconds: 997648 usec
apr_thread_mutex_t Tests
Initializing the apr_thread_mutex_t (NESTED)OK
Starting 6 threadsOK
microseconds: 986499 usec
apr_thread_rwlock_t Tests
Initializing the apr_thread_rwlock_tOK
Starting 6 threadsOK
microseconds: 24014558 usec
Trying proc mutexes with mechanism `default'...
  Mutex mechanism `default' is global in scope on this platform.
Trying global mutexes with mechanism `default'...
  no problems encountered...
Trying proc mutexes with mechanism `sysvsem'...
  Mutex mechanism `sysvsem' is global in scope on this platform.
Trying global mutexes with mechanism `sysvsem'...
  no problems encountered...
Trying proc mutexes with mechanism `posix'...
  Mutex mechanism `posix' is global in scope on this platform.
Trying global mutexes with mechanism `posix'...
  no problems encountered...
Trying proc mutexes with mechanism `fcntl'...
  Mutex mechanism `fcntl' is *NOT* global in scope on this platform.
Trying global mutexes with mechanism `fcntl'...
  no problems encountered...
Trying proc mutexes with mechanism `proc_pthread'...
  Mutex mechanism `proc_pthread' is global in scope on this platform.
Trying global mutexes with mechanism `proc_pthread'...
  no problems encountered...
testatomic  :  SUCCESS
testdir :  SUCCESS
testdso :  SUCCESS
testdup :  SUCCESS
testenv :  SUCCESS
testescape  :  SUCCESS
testfile:  SUCCESS
testfilecopy:  SUCCESS
testfileinfo:  SUCCESS
testflock   :  SUCCESS
testfmt :  SUCCESS
testfnmatch :  SUCCESS
testargs:  SUCCESS
testhash:  SUCCESS
testipsub   :  SUCCESS
testlock:  SUCCESS
testcond:  SUCCESS
testlfs :  Line 349: LFS support a no-op in 64-bit builds
SUCCESS
testmmap:  SUCCESS
testnames   :  SUCCESS
testoc  :  SUCCESS
testpath:  

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

[Christophe JAILLET]

Le 10/09/2018 à 23:22, William A Rowe Jr a écrit :

Please cast your votes on the following release candidate
found at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ (note release.sh
is generating sha256+sha512, all in coreutils format.)

Release apr-1.6.5
  [  ] +/-1

This vote will conclude at 5pm EDT Thursday 9/13, for
announcement Friday in the event of a successful vote.


+1, Ubuntu 18.04, gcc 8.1.0

CJ

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

[Jim Jagielski]

+1: macOS 10.13.6, Xcode 9.4.1
CentOS 5, 6

> On Sep 10, 2018, at 5:22 PM, William A Rowe Jr  wrote:
> 
> Please cast your votes on the following release candidate
> found at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ (note release.sh
> is generating sha256+sha512, all in coreutils format.)
> 
> Release apr-1.6.5
>   [  ] +/-1
> 
> This vote will conclude at 5pm EDT Thursday 9/13, for
> announcement Friday in the event of a successful vote.
> 

Re: [VOTE] apr-1.6.5 release

[William A Rowe Jr]

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:22 PM William A Rowe Jr 
wrote:

> Please cast your votes on the following release candidate
> found at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ (note release.sh
> is generating sha256+sha512, all in coreutils format.)
>
> Release apr-1.6.5
>   [+1] +/-1
>

Sorry for the delay; extra pre-testing on the Windows flavors that Steffen
may not have examined (and trusting his testing of dsp/dsw)...

This is my +1 based on Fedora, Ubuntu, Ubuntu on Windows,
and Win32 64-bit CMake builds.