Re: [VOTE] Increment MetadataVersion in Schema.fbs from V4 to V5 for 1.0.0 release

2020-06-30 Thread Sutou Kouhei
+1 (binding) In "[VOTE] Increment MetadataVersion in Schema.fbs from V4 to V5 for 1.0.0 release" on Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:42:45 -0500, Wes McKinney wrote: > Hi, > > As discussed on the mailing list [1], in order to demarcate the > pre-1.0.0 and post-1.0.0 worlds, and to allow the >

Re: [VOTE] Increment MetadataVersion in Schema.fbs from V4 to V5 for 1.0.0 release

2020-06-30 Thread Neal Richardson
+1 (binding) On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 2:53 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > Le 29/06/2020 à 23:42, Wes McKinney a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > As discussed on the mailing list [1], in order to demarcate the > > pre-1.0.0 and post-1.0.0 worlds, and to allow the > >

Re: [VOTE] Increment MetadataVersion in Schema.fbs from V4 to V5 for 1.0.0 release

2020-06-30 Thread Antoine Pitrou
+1 (binding) Le 29/06/2020 à 23:42, Wes McKinney a écrit : > Hi, > > As discussed on the mailing list [1], in order to demarcate the > pre-1.0.0 and post-1.0.0 worlds, and to allow the > forward-compatibility-protection changes we are making to actually > work (i.e. so that libraries can

Re: [VOTE] Increment MetadataVersion in Schema.fbs from V4 to V5 for 1.0.0 release

2020-06-30 Thread Uwe L. Korn
+1 (binding) On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, at 11:11 AM, Neville Dipale wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 06:29, Ben Kietzman wrote: > > > +1 (non binding) > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, 00:25 Wes McKinney wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:49 PM

Re: [VOTE] Increment MetadataVersion in Schema.fbs from V4 to V5 for 1.0.0 release

2020-06-30 Thread Neville Dipale
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 06:29, Ben Kietzman wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, 00:25 Wes McKinney wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:49 PM Micah Kornfield > > wrote: > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:43 PM

Re: [VOTE] Increment MetadataVersion in Schema.fbs from V4 to V5 for 1.0.0 release

2020-06-29 Thread Ben Kietzman
+1 (non binding) On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, 00:25 Wes McKinney wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:49 PM Micah Kornfield > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:43 PM Wes McKinney > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > As discussed on the mailing list [1], in

Re: [VOTE] Increment MetadataVersion in Schema.fbs from V4 to V5 for 1.0.0 release

2020-06-29 Thread Wes McKinney
+1 (binding) On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:49 PM Micah Kornfield wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:43 PM Wes McKinney wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > As discussed on the mailing list [1], in order to demarcate the > > pre-1.0.0 and post-1.0.0 worlds, and to allow the > >

Re: [VOTE] Increment MetadataVersion in Schema.fbs from V4 to V5 for 1.0.0 release

2020-06-29 Thread Micah Kornfield
+1 (binding) On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:43 PM Wes McKinney wrote: > Hi, > > As discussed on the mailing list [1], in order to demarcate the > pre-1.0.0 and post-1.0.0 worlds, and to allow the > forward-compatibility-protection changes we are making to actually > work (i.e. so that libraries can