Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Iceberg support APE

[Till Westmann]

And another late +1.


On 12 Apr 2023, at 23:34, Ian Maxon wrote:


 The vote passes with 3 binding +1's.

On Apr 12, 2023 at 22:01:21, Mike Carey  wrote:


+1 for APE1 (!)

On 4/12/23 2:17 PM, Ian Maxon wrote:

Based on the discussion in


https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.apache.org/thread/w3o0xrth73ml7rxq71c7nytgmt8m2f4y__;!!CzAuKJ42GuquVTTmVmPViYEvSg!IoaBOq7IsUaWn8he4yhC2sxFba0LLo6NOhWXP48KuB5Cg3mu2_YRzRa2ykS7qUV52FMO7f0C_w-8wA$
, it seems

like there is a positive sentiment towards our first APE proposal.

Therefore I think it is time to vote.

The vote is the usual procedure, open for 72 hours and passes with 
either 3


votes or the time elapsing with a majority of positive votes.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Iceberg support APE

[Ian Maxon]

 The vote passes with 3 binding +1's.

On Apr 12, 2023 at 22:01:21, Mike Carey  wrote:

> +1 for APE1 (!)
>
> On 4/12/23 2:17 PM, Ian Maxon wrote:
>
> Based on the discussion in
>
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.apache.org/thread/w3o0xrth73ml7rxq71c7nytgmt8m2f4y__;!!CzAuKJ42GuquVTTmVmPViYEvSg!IoaBOq7IsUaWn8he4yhC2sxFba0LLo6NOhWXP48KuB5Cg3mu2_YRzRa2ykS7qUV52FMO7f0C_w-8wA$
> , it seems
>
> like there is a positive sentiment towards our first APE proposal.
>
> Therefore I think it is time to vote.
>
> The vote is the usual procedure, open for 72 hours and passes with either 3
>
> votes or the time elapsing with a majority of positive votes.
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Iceberg support APE

[Mike Carey]

+1 for APE1 (!)

On 4/12/23 2:17 PM, Ian Maxon wrote:

Based on the discussion in
https://lists.apache.org/thread/w3o0xrth73ml7rxq71c7nytgmt8m2f4y, it seems
like there is a positive sentiment towards our first APE proposal.
Therefore I think it is time to vote.
The vote is the usual procedure, open for 72 hours and passes with either 3
votes or the time elapsing with a majority of positive votes.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Iceberg support APE

[Ian Maxon]

 And here is my +1 as well.

On Apr 12, 2023 at 15:15:19, Taewoo Kim  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 2:17 PM Ian Maxon  wrote:
>
> Based on the discussion in
>
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.apache.org/thread/w3o0xrth73ml7rxq71c7nytgmt8m2f4y__;!!CzAuKJ42GuquVTTmVmPViYEvSg!L0SlRYatmoz_r9IKVvgaxfgiQ2ad5BHwDt7PyzCj5OgWY7SGkTVBx5zSe-XhCcCNYchBVk-52UpQ8xw$
> , it seems
>
> like there is a positive sentiment towards our first APE proposal.
>
> Therefore I think it is time to vote.
>
> The vote is the usual procedure, open for 72 hours and passes with either 3
>
> votes or the time elapsing with a majority of positive votes.
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Iceberg support APE

[Taewoo Kim]

+1

On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 2:17 PM Ian Maxon  wrote:

> Based on the discussion in
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/w3o0xrth73ml7rxq71c7nytgmt8m2f4y, it seems
> like there is a positive sentiment towards our first APE proposal.
> Therefore I think it is time to vote.
> The vote is the usual procedure, open for 72 hours and passes with either 3
> votes or the time elapsing with a majority of positive votes.
>