Re: Apache Bahir release for the Flink runtime

2019-09-27 Thread Gustavo Momenté
>
> I don't think it's easy to get multiple snapshots for same artifact
> name/version.


I agree with you, I think right now the best solution for my use case (I
can't upgrade to Flink 1.9.0 yet) is to release the old versions in an
internal maven repository.

I'm not having issues build locally, but I think not having released
versions increases the burden in new users as they will have to figure how
to bundle and publish their own versions.

I'm just starting to use Apache Bahir, and will be probably using it in
production next month and this thread caught my attention. Do you think
we'll be moving forward with versioning Apache Bahir for Flink? What are
the main blockers, how can I help?

Em sex, 27 de set de 2019 às 13:27, Luciano Resende 
escreveu:

> I don't think it's easy to get multiple snapshots for same artifact
> name/version.
>
> Are you having compatibility issues ?
> Or Do you have issues building these locally with the required updates?
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 9:22 AM Gustavo Momenté
>  wrote:
> >
> > Thanks a lot, that will be really helpful. Do think it would be possible
> to
> > also publish older versions for flink 1.8.x?
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019, 13:03 Luciano Resende 
> wrote:
> >
> > > I just started publishing a snapshot  based on latest master.
> > >
> > > It will be available shortly from :
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 8:51 AM Gustavo Momenté
> > >  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Any update on this? Are snapshot published anywhere? I'm interested
> in
> > > > using Apache Bahir right now, but can't figure where snapshots are
> > > > published.
> > > >
> > > > On 2019/05/20 07:41:24, Luciano Resende  wrote:
> > > > > Ok, if everybody agrees, we can go with 1.8.0 and try to keep it
> > > > synchronized.>
> > > > >
> > > > > As for remaining items, any must-have items before we try a release
> > > > candidate?>
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 12:30 AM Joao Boto 
> wrote:>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > > if we re going to try to be syncronized with flink version and
> this
> > > > could be important because of Blink (Alibaba fork) integration to
> Flink>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > > i think that the next release should be 1.8.0>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > > El lun., 20 may. 2019 a las 0:21, Luciano Resende (<
> lu...@gmail.com
> > > >)
> > > > escribió:>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >> What should we call the next release then? Just 1.1? 1.5? 2.0?>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 00:13 Joao Boto 
> wrote:>
> > > > > 
> > > > > >>> There are a new connectors and some actualizations on previous
> > > > connectors>
> > > > > >>> Because of that I think so.>
> > > > > 
> > > > > >>> Relatively to synchronization to Flink version, could be
> > > interesting
> > > > but we have to do release more often>
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > >>> Joao Boto>
> > > > > 
> > > > > >>> El dom., 19 may. 2019 a las 23:05, Luciano Resende (<
> > > lu...@gmail.com>)
> > > > escribió:>
> > > > > >
> > > > >  It has been a while since the last Bahir release for the
> Apache
> > > > Flink>
> > > > >  runtime, should we create one?>
> > > > > >
> > > > >  Also, the last release was 1.0, what should we call it now (as
> > > > Flink>
> > > > >  is around 1.8)? Any synchronization required/desired?>
> > > > > >
> > > > >  -->
> > > > >  Luciano Resende>
> > > > >  http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> > > > >  http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >> -->
> > > > > >> Sent from my Mobile device>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -- >
> > > > > Luciano Resende>
> > > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>


Re: Apache Bahir release for the Flink runtime

2019-09-27 Thread Gustavo Momenté
Thanks a lot, that will be really helpful. Do think it would be possible to
also publish older versions for flink 1.8.x?

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019, 13:03 Luciano Resende  wrote:

> I just started publishing a snapshot  based on latest master.
>
> It will be available shortly from :
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 8:51 AM Gustavo Momenté
>  wrote:
> >
> > Any update on this? Are snapshot published anywhere? I'm interested in
> > using Apache Bahir right now, but can't figure where snapshots are
> > published.
> >
> > On 2019/05/20 07:41:24, Luciano Resende  wrote:
> > > Ok, if everybody agrees, we can go with 1.8.0 and try to keep it
> > synchronized.>
> > >
> > > As for remaining items, any must-have items before we try a release
> > candidate?>
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 12:30 AM Joao Boto  wrote:>
> > > >>
> > > > if we re going to try to be syncronized with flink version and this
> > could be important because of Blink (Alibaba fork) integration to Flink>
> > > >>
> > > > i think that the next release should be 1.8.0>
> > > >>
> > > > El lun., 20 may. 2019 a las 0:21, Luciano Resende ( >)
> > escribió:>
> > > >>>
> > > >> What should we call the next release then? Just 1.1? 1.5? 2.0?>
> > > >>>
> > > >> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 00:13 Joao Boto  wrote:>
> > > 
> > > >>> There are a new connectors and some actualizations on previous
> > connectors>
> > > >>> Because of that I think so.>
> > > 
> > > >>> Relatively to synchronization to Flink version, could be
> interesting
> > but we have to do release more often>
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >>> Joao Boto>
> > > 
> > > >>> El dom., 19 may. 2019 a las 23:05, Luciano Resende (<
> lu...@gmail.com>)
> > escribió:>
> > > >
> > >  It has been a while since the last Bahir release for the Apache
> > Flink>
> > >  runtime, should we create one?>
> > > >
> > >  Also, the last release was 1.0, what should we call it now (as
> > Flink>
> > >  is around 1.8)? Any synchronization required/desired?>
> > > >
> > >  -->
> > >  Luciano Resende>
> > >  http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> > >  http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > > >>>
> > > >> -->
> > > >> Sent from my Mobile device>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -- >
> > > Luciano Resende>
> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>


Re: Apache Bahir release for the Flink runtime

2019-09-27 Thread Luciano Resende
I just started publishing a snapshot  based on latest master.

It will be available shortly from :
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 8:51 AM Gustavo Momenté
 wrote:
>
> Any update on this? Are snapshot published anywhere? I'm interested in
> using Apache Bahir right now, but can't figure where snapshots are
> published.
>
> On 2019/05/20 07:41:24, Luciano Resende  wrote:
> > Ok, if everybody agrees, we can go with 1.8.0 and try to keep it
> synchronized.>
> >
> > As for remaining items, any must-have items before we try a release
> candidate?>
> >
> > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 12:30 AM Joao Boto  wrote:>
> > >>
> > > if we re going to try to be syncronized with flink version and this
> could be important because of Blink (Alibaba fork) integration to Flink>
> > >>
> > > i think that the next release should be 1.8.0>
> > >>
> > > El lun., 20 may. 2019 a las 0:21, Luciano Resende ()
> escribió:>
> > >>>
> > >> What should we call the next release then? Just 1.1? 1.5? 2.0?>
> > >>>
> > >> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 00:13 Joao Boto  wrote:>
> > 
> > >>> There are a new connectors and some actualizations on previous
> connectors>
> > >>> Because of that I think so.>
> > 
> > >>> Relatively to synchronization to Flink version, could be interesting
> but we have to do release more often>
> > 
> > 
> > >>> Joao Boto>
> > 
> > >>> El dom., 19 may. 2019 a las 23:05, Luciano Resende ()
> escribió:>
> > >
> >  It has been a while since the last Bahir release for the Apache
> Flink>
> >  runtime, should we create one?>
> > >
> >  Also, the last release was 1.0, what should we call it now (as
> Flink>
> >  is around 1.8)? Any synchronization required/desired?>
> > >
> >  -->
> >  Luciano Resende>
> >  http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> >  http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > >>>
> > >> -->
> > >> Sent from my Mobile device>
> >
> >
> >
> > -- >
> > Luciano Resende>
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> >



-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/


Re: Apache Bahir release for the Flink runtime

2019-09-27 Thread Gustavo Momenté
Any update on this? Are snapshot published anywhere? I'm interested in
using Apache Bahir right now, but can't figure where snapshots are
published.

On 2019/05/20 07:41:24, Luciano Resende  wrote:
> Ok, if everybody agrees, we can go with 1.8.0 and try to keep it
synchronized.>
>
> As for remaining items, any must-have items before we try a release
candidate?>
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 12:30 AM Joao Boto  wrote:>
> >>
> > if we re going to try to be syncronized with flink version and this
could be important because of Blink (Alibaba fork) integration to Flink>
> >>
> > i think that the next release should be 1.8.0>
> >>
> > El lun., 20 may. 2019 a las 0:21, Luciano Resende ()
escribió:>
> >>>
> >> What should we call the next release then? Just 1.1? 1.5? 2.0?>
> >>>
> >> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 00:13 Joao Boto  wrote:>
> 
> >>> There are a new connectors and some actualizations on previous
connectors>
> >>> Because of that I think so.>
> 
> >>> Relatively to synchronization to Flink version, could be interesting
but we have to do release more often>
> 
> 
> >>> Joao Boto>
> 
> >>> El dom., 19 may. 2019 a las 23:05, Luciano Resende ()
escribió:>
> >
>  It has been a while since the last Bahir release for the Apache
Flink>
>  runtime, should we create one?>
> >
>  Also, the last release was 1.0, what should we call it now (as
Flink>
>  is around 1.8)? Any synchronization required/desired?>
> >
>  -->
>  Luciano Resende>
>  http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
>  http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> >>>
> >> -->
> >> Sent from my Mobile device>
>
>
>
> -- >
> Luciano Resende>
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
>


Re: Apache Bahir release for the Flink runtime

2019-05-20 Thread Luciano Resende
Ok, if everybody agrees, we can go with 1.8.0 and try to keep it synchronized.

As for remaining items, any must-have items before we try a release candidate?

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 12:30 AM Joao Boto  wrote:
>
> if we re going to try to be syncronized with flink version and this could be 
> important because of Blink (Alibaba fork) integration to Flink
>
> i think that the next release should be 1.8.0
>
> El lun., 20 may. 2019 a las 0:21, Luciano Resende () 
> escribió:
>>
>> What should we call the next release then? Just 1.1? 1.5? 2.0?
>>
>> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 00:13 Joao Boto  wrote:
>>>
>>> There are a new connectors and some actualizations on previous connectors
>>> Because of that I think so.
>>>
>>> Relatively to synchronization to Flink version, could be interesting but we 
>>> have to do release more often
>>>
>>>
>>> Joao Boto
>>>
>>> El dom., 19 may. 2019 a las 23:05, Luciano Resende () 
>>> escribió:

 It has been a while since the last Bahir release for the Apache Flink
 runtime, should we create one?

 Also, the last release was 1.0, what should we call it now (as Flink
 is around 1.8)? Any synchronization required/desired?

 --
 Luciano Resende
 http://twitter.com/lresende1975
 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>
>> --
>> Sent from my Mobile device



-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/


Re: Apache Bahir release for the Flink runtime

2019-05-19 Thread Joao Boto
if we re going to try to be syncronized with flink version and this could
be important because of Blink (Alibaba fork) integration to Flink

i think that the next release should be 1.8.0

El lun., 20 may. 2019 a las 0:21, Luciano Resende ()
escribió:

> What should we call the next release then? Just 1.1? 1.5? 2.0?
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 00:13 Joao Boto  wrote:
>
>> There are a new connectors and some actualizations on previous connectors
>> Because of that I think so.
>>
>> Relatively to synchronization to Flink version, could be interesting but
>> we have to do release more often
>>
>>
>> Joao Boto
>>
>> El dom., 19 may. 2019 a las 23:05, Luciano Resende ()
>> escribió:
>>
>>> It has been a while since the last Bahir release for the Apache Flink
>>> runtime, should we create one?
>>>
>>> Also, the last release was 1.0, what should we call it now (as Flink
>>> is around 1.8)? Any synchronization required/desired?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Luciano Resende
>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>>
>> --
> Sent from my Mobile device
>


Re: Apache Bahir release for the Flink runtime

2019-05-19 Thread Luciano Resende
What should we call the next release then? Just 1.1? 1.5? 2.0?

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 00:13 Joao Boto  wrote:

> There are a new connectors and some actualizations on previous connectors
> Because of that I think so.
>
> Relatively to synchronization to Flink version, could be interesting but
> we have to do release more often
>
>
> Joao Boto
>
> El dom., 19 may. 2019 a las 23:05, Luciano Resende ()
> escribió:
>
>> It has been a while since the last Bahir release for the Apache Flink
>> runtime, should we create one?
>>
>> Also, the last release was 1.0, what should we call it now (as Flink
>> is around 1.8)? Any synchronization required/desired?
>>
>> --
>> Luciano Resende
>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>
> --
Sent from my Mobile device


Re: Apache Bahir release for the Flink runtime

2019-05-19 Thread Joao Boto
There are a new connectors and some actualizations on previous connectors
Because of that I think so.

Relatively to synchronization to Flink version, could be interesting but we
have to do release more often


Joao Boto

El dom., 19 may. 2019 a las 23:05, Luciano Resende ()
escribió:

> It has been a while since the last Bahir release for the Apache Flink
> runtime, should we create one?
>
> Also, the last release was 1.0, what should we call it now (as Flink
> is around 1.8)? Any synchronization required/desired?
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>